C's:
“Gravity is manipulated by sound when thought manipulated by gravity chooses to produce sound which manipulates gravity.”
vrijdag 26 oktober 2007
» Gravity, Sound and Thought.
dinsdag 23 oktober 2007
*STO, STS, Greys, Humans and the Reptilians][Energy exchange and Time]: [22 okt 2007] {P8}
23-okt-2007
Reading some of Part 8 (of the Wave)
{http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave8.htm}
Preface
Start> 10:06 PM [22:06]
Well as some of you might know I have been reading Wave quite some time now, I haven't got much time to read it a lot, because of school, work and a very energy-taking forum. But, I will talk about that in another message.
Yesterday I started to read part 8 of the Wave. From [Before we go on...] 'till [...us of free will].
Summary and some Thoughts about what I have learned.
So it seems that STS people are people of Wishful Thinking. Thoughts like ''THAT won't happen to me!''... Hmm it's interesting, because would people who think they already have all the knowledge, answers (only by thinking?) and think that they are the ones that people must listen to... would this also be Wishful Thinking? I guess so.
The STS mode is a reflection of the collecting of gravity.
The STO mode is a reflection of the dispersion of gravity.
To get to the next ''level'' (4th density) it is needed to learn the lessons of this density.
(Also it doesn't mean that people who are very spiritual and think they can't function in this world have learned all the lessons... quite the opposite, I think). The lessons we have to learn:
''Karmic and simple understandings'' as the Cassiopaeans have said.
Also something that is actually quite logic to me and very important, is:
''Knowledge and awareness makes you aware that you have free will, and also makes you aware of what actions actually ARE acts of free will, and therefore, when you know or suspect the difference between the lies an deception and truth, then you are in a position to be in control of your life.''
So if you know what free will, really is, you can understand it more completely and know when you can really speak of acts of free will.
The passion of knowledge is not passion, but soul questing. I think that made some things clear, because I know someone who feels like not wanting to read (for example the Wave or transcripts) 'cause it would be weird, to only doing so with the reason of that knowledge protects. It would feel STS-ish. I guess if someone wants knowledge, it's just something you need, hmm.. like the C's said ''It is simply that one is at that point on the learning cycle. At that point, no drive is needed.''
Many people that I have met on the internet, forums etc. like the whole ''love-and-light'' thing. It feels so appealing to them, so good. So it must be ''good'' to them. Like I have written in my story (Mountain of Knowledge): ''They give eachother exactly what they expect from eachother''.
I just really couldn't stop, actually, laughing and thinking how, how they could think like that? Think that giving love and light energy (how do you do this anyway?) to someone who looks ''mean'', and that that would be a way to ''defeat'' them, or make them go away? Or putting some kind of stones around your bed, lighting some kind of candle, saying some words, ...could that really shoo some ''negative'' things away? And what are those negative things anyway? Could they be just something they think is real but actually isn't?
Laura wrote:
Now about the way we see reality. In part 8, there is a very good example (actually a real hypnosis session) of how someone's belief system was ''activated'' in a manner that was ''acceptable'' to his ''ego survivual'' instincts, this was clear because of the fact he didn't see the Third Man in the room, after he was told that the Third Man had to go (called away on urgent business). (The third man was still in the room of course, but the one who was being hypnotised didn't see him) {See for the example Part 8}“Then, of course, there is the question of making "leaps" as described above - wanting to "skip over" the 3rd density part and go right back to where all is wonderful and happy and peaceful. One has to realize that this sort of thinking is more deeply STS than it might at first appear because, in the end, what is wanted is to escape the hard work of learning the lessons of this density. What is wanted is "ease and comfort" and no work.”
What is the survival of the ego? ''The survival of the ego is established early in life bij our parental and societal programming as to :
What IS or
What IS NOT
possible.''
In other words: ''What we are seeing is OUR interpretation of a series of waves or fluctuations of the MEDIUM of our reality, which we interpret according to our ''program.''
So I guess, what we have learned when we were young, things like ''These are clouds.'', ''Ghosts and aliens don't exist.'' etc. determine the way we perceive things. And I think, it also determines the way we think, cause in the end, mostly it's one of our I's, that chooses what the person/I's wants to believe or not. I mean, some people choose to believe that are aliens out there, even that they have learned when they were young that Aliens don't exist, and thinking that they do, sounds and is stupid to others.
But that might be another thing.
I'm still kinda struggling on Gurdjieff's quote:
“And, of course, "observing phenomena" means, in its most literal sense, to gain and gather knowledge of every form and sort so that one has a sufficient database from which to draw conclusions about observations of one's environment.But, this is difficult to do because one's beliefs are intimately tied to emotions! Remember: our beliefs are formed in emotional situations of interactions with our parents and other "authorities" of our infancy and childhood! It is very frightening to even contemplate breaking free of this safe, inner "environment.”
~G~ What does he actually mean with ''breaking free of the safe environment''? Just trying to break free of the usual ''beliefs'' that are made in this environment? Or something deeper? Still thinking on this one. Maybe it might get clear when I have read the whole book ''In search of the Miraculous.'' So I put a G in front of this paragraph, so I'll read this part after reading the book, to see if I know then what he really means.
There is some more that I learned, but I'll get to that tomorrow! [It turns out to be 3 days later, guess my other I('s) didn't agree on the 'tomorrow' thingy...]
End> 11:12 PM [23:12]
26-okt-2007
Start> 11:42 AM [11:42]
From the 10-22-94 session I read that human beings have chosen to experience/be in physical matter (to experience physical sensations). This was a group mind decision.
And I made this little ''sketch'' about the long and short wave cycle (click on it for a bigger view):
Cassiopaeans say:
“Positive by-product is an increase in relative energy which speeds up the learning process of the soul and all of it's one-dimensional and two-dimensional interactive partners. In other words, flora and fauna, minerals, etc. All experience growth and movement towards reunion at a faster rate on the cycle through this short wave cycle physical/ethereal transfer. Of a negative nature, it also produces many negative experiences for these very same entities which otherwise would not exist because being of a first level and second level nature, flora and fauna would ordinarily experience a long term or long wave cycle on the physical plane as opposed to a short wave cycle physical and ethereal, as they do now because of their interaction with the human species in its short wave ethereal/physical cycle.”Beings like the Reptilians and Grey (who 'live' in the 4th density) have different ways of nourishment than we have (3rd density).
C's say:
“Extreme fear and anxiety builds up fear/anxiety energy which is of a negative nature which fuels the beings that you speak of in that they draw from that and produce a sort of a fueling energy which keeps them going as one of their forms of nourishment based on their metabolic structure.”Physical methods: The drinking of blood and blood by-products which is done through pores. By bathing and then absorbing the necessary products and then disposing of the remaining product. => The Lizard Beings and the beings we describe as Grays (are examples of beings) who feed themselves through these two methods.
“Part of their reason for existence on the 4th level is their ability to nourish themselves through
ethereal methods
and through
physical methods
and therefore, this energy transfer {feeding off of energy of negative nature} would represent the ethereal method of nourishment and other means are achieved physically.”

Some more important things:
> With each progression upward in density level, the existence for the individual conscious entity becomes less difficult. [It puts less strain on the soul energy]
> As you advance to the fourth level of density which is coming up for you, you must now make a choice as to whether to progress to service to others or to remain at the level of service to self. This will what is referred to as the ''thousand year period.''
“This is the period as measured in your calendar terms that will determine whether or not you will advance to service to others or remain at the level of service to self. And those who are described as the Lizards have chosen to firmly lock themselves into service to self. And, since they are at the highest level of density where this is possible, they must continually draw large amounts of negative energy from those at the third level, second level, and so on, which is why they do what they do. This also explains why their race is dying, because they have not been able to learn for themselves how to remove themselves from this particular form of expression to that of service to others. And, since they have such, as you would measure it, a long period of time, remained at this level and, in fact, become firmly entrenched in it, and, in fact, have increased themselves in it, this is why they are dying and desperately trying to take as much energy from you as possible and also to recreate their race metabolically.”
And it's interesting that the Cassiopaeans answered “They do.” on the question “Well, if we are sources of food and labor for them, why don't they just breed us in pens on their own planet?”
...So I guess, this is not the only planet with humans on it?
The Lizard beings have been traveling back and forth through time (as we know it), to set things up so that they can adsorb a maximum amount of negative energy with the transference from third level to fourth level that this planet is going to experience, in the hopes that they can overtake us on the fourth level and thereby accomplish several things:
1: retaining their race as a viable species;
2: increasing their numbers;
3: increasing their power;
4: expanding their race throughout the realm of fourth density.
However this all will fail, because the Greys and Lizard Beings as being STS beings in the fourth dimension only see what they want to see. Which is the opposite of the STO beings, because STO entities can see all, C's say: “We can see all that is at all points as is, not as we would want it to be.”
Also what is a noticeable important thing:
“They (the Lizzies/Lizard Beings) did not live among mankind, but they did interact directly with human beings, at various points in the past. It was at those points when human beings were ready, willing and able to accept deities appearing directly from outside sources and then worship them. Such things would not have occurred in the recent past. But, beware, it may very well occur very soon.”
Also something important is that wishful thinking in the fourth dimension is quite different than it is ''experienced'' here. Because “wishful thinking represented on the fourth level becomes reality for that level. It would be your awareness.”
I think it/this might sound quite 'wanting' to some people, 'cause being able to make all your dreams come true, make them real... I guess it might be fun to some extent, but also very sad. Because the fact is, that you're living in a non-existing reality, all looks real, but actually is fake. I think it would be boring... but... would you know that it is all your creation and thoughts? I guess not. Like C's say “It would be your awareness.”
The thing about humans being food, is something that sounds at first quite shocking and if you look around you, it is something that happens everywhere. An exchange of energy. At school I'm more like the joke-maker and the one who's mostly the energy-full one... does that mean I am the ''dominator'' and that I am the main energy-sucker? I don't know what to think of this...
The thing is, when people are around me, they get kinda 'pumped up' except if I go too far with some jokes, others are having fun and laughing but the ''target'' person... it is clear to see that she is sitting there, with having no smile on her face... Kinda mean, but it is never something I mean to do, it's like when making jokes and I see and notice other people (I mean everyone then) laugh with it, something makes me go on, then I lose control and the little mean I of me gets in charge. This doesn't happen anymore since, I gotta keep an eye on myself... External consideration...
Tomorrow [I hope...] I will go on and make a summary and some comments on the rest of Part 8. I am gonna finish it reading today.
(Again, I post now two days later, well atleast I did finish reading part 8 yesterday!) (Or maybe I am overeacting hehe)
End> 3:30 PM [15:30]
28-okt-2007
Start> 5:43 PM [17:43]
Well what I read yesterday was about some very interesting things like: how people really see the whole God thingy.
And I must post this good piece for a better understanding of what people really believe in God:
“In Arabic, the "face" of something signifies its essence or reality. To say that God turns His face toward someone means that He manifests His reality to that person through self-disclosure. If the only Face of God you CHOOSE to see, is the "Good and Loving" face - then the other will manifest in your life in other ways. It is a little like being "in love" with someone who has certain characteristics that you decide to try to change, or to "put up with" (often by changing some essential thing about yourself). You don't REALLY LOVE THAT PERSON AS HE/SHE IS. And the same is true of our "Love of God." How can we possibly LOVE Him, if we deny fully HALF of His being? If we set ouselves up as judge and jury as to what part of the universe, what part of existence, what part of GOD, is acceptable and "okay?"”I print all these Wave pages, mark them, translate words I don't understand and that last paragraph that I showed, here above was totally marked! I liked that piece, cause unfortunately it happens a lot (what was said)!
....
“To live in a condition where one denies the right of the so-called "base character traits" to exist, to consider them an "error" or a "rebellion," a "Satanic delusion," is to deny fully half of existence, fully half of God - to reject Him, to NOT love him; to love only those parts that the limited human mind consider to be "acceptable" and to "hate" those parts that are not "pleasant" and desirable to fleshly comfort - and it is to love subjectively only the part of the self that is "acceptable." And this is a crucial point. To ACCEPT one's own self, in all its many parts. That does NOT mean that one "manifests" every negative character trait, it means that one accepts, loves, and tries always to choose to manifest the noble traits and to channel the base traits productively. To love objectively, all that IS, unconditionally, both the light and the darkness, and to NEVER interfere with the Free Will of another to choose to do or be as they see fit is one of the keys; one of the "simple understandings."”
Maybe this doesn't relate much to it, but it might be an example of ignoring the bad things and only focussing on the good things:
When I was at the very beginning of this ''journey'' and I knew about the Lizzies, the meteorites, the whole Bush lies etc. I felt this urge that everyone should know this! I started to talk with this girl on Windows Messenger (I met her on deviantart.com) I don't really remember how it started, but I think... Ah yea! It started with me telling about the dissapearing of the bee's, she didn't believe me, so I linked her Laura's post (and because it was a long post/article, she of course didn't wanted to read, which is fine >their choice<). She made a remark like ''I don't really care''. Then somehow the conversation turned out to be about meteorites and I told her, that from now 'till 2012 there might be a good chance that meteorites will fall on planet Earth... and that almost every week there is a small meteorite seen. Then she started to say that I shouldn't doomthink to much, and shouldn't think about these horrible bad things, she also commented that she has a 'meteorite-phobia''/fear for meteorites. She got really upset and said I think too negative... She didn't liked it at all. After a minute she said she had to go somewhere, and I asked her 'Would you like to go on with this another day?' (I don't really know why I ask this, maybe out of hope that she might understand the seriousness?...) She replied 'No.'. , I said ''Okey :)'' And that was the last time I spoke to her.
Well as you can read, my experience with such people was kinda like 0 before. I haven't read G's (Gurdjieff) comments about that kind of people, people that do not deserve knowledge etc etc and I haven't read Laura's and C's comments before this, that you should act in favor of your destiny, try not to interfere with other people, since it is their choice of how they want to think things and see things. It will be negative for both and will only be a tiring energy-exchange... Good that I know now, now I need to really try to do this and not be tempted by my ''You should really know this''-feelings. G. also said, hmm.. can't find that quote! But he said something about, if you keep your knowledge inside you and not share it with those who do not want it or ask for it and so being yourself and not let the other I get control of you, so to speak, and that someone would see things in him/herself that he/she had never seen before. I am troubling to say his quote, so think how good he said it in one sentence!
Alright, let's carry on.
Q: How does it come that you are taking energy from someone by giving them love when not asked?Determining the needs of another, hmmm... Geez, did I have a lot of problem doing things where I asked myself time after time ''Is this determining the needs of another?''. You see, I was active on this forum, where there used to be a big commercial thingy about Indigo-children, so think about what kind of forum that was. How much energy and especially time I wasted there! Whatever I said, was being understood totally wrong which confused me and this kept going and going and going on. People started to say that I give ''negative'' feeling and that I am mean. The last conversation I had on that forum was with someone who said a whole speech about: ''What is desinformation? I don't think such thing exist.'' And everyone falling in the big hole saying ''I agree''. Of course I said something about it, it was a total... gosh how do you say it, a waste of time!! It was the last drip that let the bucket overflow, or how do you say that in english... In other words, it made me make the real decision to just disconnect that forum, say a good goodbye (like linking the wave, showing the recommended books etc.) and then leave for good! And this is what I have been doing, made a blog, finally deciding to really FINISH reading the wave! And then start the Adventures and make something like this, so that I can really learn what I am reading, and make some kind of analysing for myself and also maybe for others? If they read this :).
A: Because an STS vehicle does not learn to be an STO candidate by determining the needs of another.
Now where was I... Ah yes, determining the needs of another is STS.
Q: So, when you seek to impose or exert influence of any kind, you are, in effect, trying to play God and taking it upon yourself to decide that there is something wrong with the universe that it is up to you to fix, which amounts to judgment.So again, do not try to go against someone free will and also something else: If you see an enlightened being, it does not mean that it sends out Love. It just mean, like the C's say, that it is smart and only teach those who ask!:
A: Yes, you see, one can advise, that is okay, but do not attempt to alter the lesson.
Q: What I am trying to get to is an understanding of an enlightened being. Eddie and a LOT of other people have the idea that an enlightened being IS LOVE, and that is what they radiate, and that this is a result of being enlightened.Also something very important!
A: No, no, no, no, no. "Enlightened" does not mean good. Just smart.
Q: Okay, so there are STS and STO enlightened beings?
A: Yes, we believe the overall ratio is 50/50.
Q: Okay, what is the profile of an enlightened STO being?
A: An intelligent being who only gives.
Q: Well, since we have dealt with the idea of not giving love to those who don't ask, what do they give and to whom do they give it?
A: All; to those who ask.
“Now, a lot of people manipulate in order to get "energy." That is not asking. Begging, pleading, acting pitiful, being helpless or a klutz or a screw-up are all ways of taking energy. And, what is the result?
...if anything, such an energy transference even could enhance the effect. ...Imbalanced waves could be drawn upon by the receiver.
This means, in a very real sense, that much of the activity on this Earth that passes for "benevolent acts" consists in FEEDING the STS hierarchy. It is rather like the "co-dependent" relationship. The abuser cannot abuse you without your permission. Not only that, all the activity to "save" this or that group, to "bomb the earth and its inhabitants with love and light," may only serve to increase the negativity, the darkness, and the control system because, without having been asked, or acting against those whose choice it is to deceive, to control, to disinform, we are violating their free will in acting "against" them, even if our intentions are "good." Thus, they feed on this energy, increasing their energy in Service to Self.
We all want to "save" our loved ones from mistakes of judgment or act. We all die a little inside when we see our children following pathways that could, in some cases, actually end in their deaths. But, in truth, we can only advise, we cannot ACT against their choices if they are at or beyond the age of "consent." But, where so many of us fall by the wayside is in not understanding how much of this is "masked" in the guise of helplessness and appeals to our sense of pity and compassion.”
So thinking about acting in favor of others (stop someone to kill for example, cause it can save others), is still acting against one's free will (not the thinking, but doing it, yknow) and it would be determining the needs of another (thinking: better for you not to)!
And this could even make the killer want more: ''if anything, such an energy transference even could enhance the effect''
Hey, I'll get back to this tomorrow, 'cause got some homework to do.
End> 8:09 PM [20:09]
1-November-2007
Start> Forgot PM [Forgot]
Going on with the last pages of the Wave Part 8:
So it seems that people who generate sensations of pity, do not really pity anybody but themselves.And when someone gives pity, when someone sends love and light to those who complain, to those in darkness and want to be ''saved'' without effort on their own part , it seems that you essentiallyt are giving power to their further disintegration, or contraction into self-ishness.
In other words: You are empowering their descent into STS.
Also something important:
“You need to act in facor of your destiny.”
And:
(L) “In other words, if we are involved with people who are not aware, who do not understand the situation, the controls and manipulations from other densities; and further, if they don't WANT to learn, we are in a ''no-win'' situation, and the only real option is to extricate ourselves, otherwise we are ''dancing with the Devil,'' so to speak.”
A ''no-win'' situation indeed! It is only a very tiring energy exchange which leads to nothing, only to the knowledge that it is going nowhere... And that the best thing that you can do is indeed: Extricate.
A: Once you have truly learned the program, just plug it in. Q: I guess once you have truly learned what is being said here, just plug it in... All you have to do is learn the patterns of behavior, the subtle signs, and you will always have the ability of avoiding it. Your own as well as others.
Q: So, once you have learned the program from this person, you will be able to avoid getting into another, similar one. (T) But, I should have learned it from H. I did the same thing twice.
A: The signs were present, but you did not read them. You did not yet know the program. Anticipate not!
Q: I guess that means that when you are thinking that you can change another person, or that changing something about what you are doing naturally will help them, you are anticipating.
A: Or that it would be different that it turned out to be. Lesson number 1: Always expect attack. Lesson number 2: Know the modes of same. Lesson number 3: Know how to conteract same.
Q: I guess that it is true that anything that tends to cause interference in doing what one is here to do could be considered attack. Whether it is your mother being sick, or your kid falling off a bicycle and breaking his arm. It is all related to lack of vigilance on the part of the one who is the conduit of attack.
A: When you are under attack, expect the unexpected, if it is going to cause problems...
Q: So, if there is something that can cause problems, expect it to happen.
A: But, if you expect it, you learn how to "head it off," thus neutralizing it. This is called vigilance, which is rooted in knowledge. And, what does knowledge do?
Q: Protects! I guess that a person just has to come to the full realization that virtually everything that happens on the planet - no exceptions - is a symbol of some interaction of STS vs STO energy at higher levels.
A: Yes, and for many, that is not as of yet realized. It must be part of a natural learning process.
So the lessons are:
1 - Always expect attack.
2- Know the modes of same.
3- Know how to conteract same.
So keep your eyes open and try not to miss anything and try to act in favor of your destiny.
Now about time. It is a non-existing ''thing'' that is ''made up'' in our reality and we are manipulated so much that it is very hard for us to unplug ourselves from it.
C's:
“We have already told you that it is a non-existent, artificial creation of illusion for the point of learning at the level where you are at or were, and once you have left that level, you no longer need it.”Time does not exist, but what does this mean for us? Do we need to act now that time really doesn't exist, or do we adjust?
(T) Do you wear a watch? (L) No. (SV) I have to because of my schedule. (T) But, you wear the watch because other people believe in time? (SV) Yes. (T) And that is out of courtesy for their belief, not your belief.
A: That is precisely correct. While you are still in this third density it is still necessary for you to conform, to a certain extent, to the ways of others who are more comfortable within the realm of third density. But, as we have stated previously, perhaps it is "time" for you to begin preparing for fourth density and not concern yourself any more than is absolutely necessary with all the where's and why's and what for's of third density reality. This truly is behind you, now, and we know that because we can see from all levels six through one and back again in full cycle.
As the C's have said it, it is still necessary for you to conform, ot a certain extent, to the ways of others who are more comfortable within the realm of third density.
A nice ending of part 8 by Laura:
So, having shared with you some of the "simple understandings" that we have been learning in this process, I would like to leave you, again, with the thought:
An STS vehicle does not learn how to be an STO candidate by determining the needs of another.
We need to think long and hard about this. How many groups and religions and cultures and political systems down through the Millennia have acted in this very way? The one's that come chiefly to my mind are, of course, the monotheistic religions and all the scare tactics and hypnotic efforts used by them to "save" humanity. It's really scary when you think about it.
We are ALL Service to Self here in 3rd density - we wouldn't be here otherwise. Struggling against it isn't going to help. But, learning to make your choices so that you are the LEAST avaialable "food" for other beings (acting "in favor" of your destiny), and stopping your own feeding on the energy and resources of others is definitely a plus. There ARE relationships where it is agreed that the members will feed one another with knowledge and support and emotional energy, time and money, and all other things. And if it is done in honesty, with no hidden agendas, because each wants and needs what the other wants and needs to offer, then that is symbiosis and is Service to Others.
So, essentially, the difference between being STS, but moving in the direction of STO (an STO candidate) and being STS that is really "evil," seems to consist in deliberately CHOOSING STS. Most people are duped and tricked into choosing it. When they begin to understand what it is that they are really doing, they begin to "wake up." And, when they wake up, they then make the choice - to give or to take. And the ALL blinks neither at the Darkness nor at the Light.
Remember, density refers to one's conscious awareness only. Once one is aware, ALL conforms to that awareness.
Everywhere you look, there is the Face of God.
Learned a lot of valuable information on this part, I just took a look at part 9 and it's about weird beings that we have seen throughout the decades on earth. Window fallers? Interesting!
End> 4:50 PM [16:50]
*
maandag 22 oktober 2007
» De Pyramiden, Bermuda Driehoek en Atlantis. [Dutch]
∆ The Great Pyramid ∆ – (grote) pyramide
In dit document probeer ik zo goed mogelijk informatie over de pyramiden te vertalen. Deze informatie komt vooral uit de Wave geschreven door Laura Knight-Jadczyk en van de sessies die zij had/heeft met de Cassiopaeans, wezens afkomstig van de zesde density. Zijn ze betrouwbaar? Dat weet ik niet, maar mijn gevoel zegt van wel, veel dingen dat je bijvoorbeeld in de Wave tegenkomt, kom je ook tegen in andere bronnen (Je hoeft natuurlijk deze dingen niet 100% te geloven he! Meer om je ook een andere kijk te geven op deze prachtige creaties!). Ik vind deze bron een van de beste die ik ooit ben tegengekomen, maar vergeet niet dat niet alle informatie uit 1 bron komt! Soms is het meer duidelijk als je het in engels leest en ook heb ik soms twijfel of ik sommige dingen goed vertaal, maar daar heb ik niet veel problemen mee hoor! Maar toch voor de zekerheid, heb ik de Engelse teksten erbij gezet (die ik vertaal) en ook sommige woordjes en zinnen uit de tekst gehaald en in het rood getypt voor meer duidelijkheid. Veel leesplezier!
July 16, 1994 F**, Laura and S** :
Q: (L) Who built the great pyramid?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (L) What year was it built?
A: 10643 years ago.
Q: (L) Why was it built? What purpose was it used for?
A: Capture cosmic energy.
Q: (L) And what was this cosmic energy used for once it was captured?
A: Many things. Power, transport, healing, mind control, climate, etcetera.
Q: (L) Who built the sphinx?
A: Same.
Q: (L) Was the sphinx built at the same time?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Why was the sphinx built? What was its purpose?
A: Temple.
Q: (L) Are there records buried under the sphinx?
A: Yes.
Wave part 4:
http://www.cassiopaea.org/cass/wave_iv.htm
...Yes, they did. First of all, the Atlantean civilization existed for a very long time and was quite extensive all over the globe, not necessarily confined to the semi-legendary "continent of Atlantis." Apparently, interplanetary travel was as easy for the Atlanteans as it is for us to take a trip to the store. They had bases on the Moon, bases on Mars; the monuments of the Moon and Mars are Atlantean in origin; they also had some of their giant crystals on the Moon and Mars, and these were used to collect Cosmic and Solar energy as a power source. We have talked about locations of such crystals on the Earth and why they were not destroyed in the cataclysms that destroyed Atlantis and the answer was that the engineered function of these crystals was such that massive amounts of energy interacting with them is absorbed and transmuted, so to speak. If you put an atomic bomb on one of them, it would absorb the energy and transduce it. It was the design function. When we asked if our present technology could decipher how to use these crystals, and the response was "would a Neanderthal know how to fly a 747." [Laughter] So, when we are talking about the Atlanteans, we are talking about a super advanced civilization and the descendants of them, after the destruction that occurred which destroyed this amazing culture, built these pyramidal shapes, which had a similar function as the pyramid shaped giant crystals, though much less effective. In other words, the Pyramids are simply gigantic machines. They were used to manipulate energy to control weather, power the many things that a civilization requires to be considered "advanced," to preserve and transmute or heal. Just a whole host of energy applications similar to what we do with electricity. But, still, it was a step down from the far more advanced Atlantean technology, and as time went by, other things occurred, and event his knowledge was lost.
----------------Vertaling------------------
De grote pyramide is gebouwd door de Atlanteanen 10656 jaren geleden. Het is gemaakt voor het absorberen van kosmische energie. De kosmische energie werd gebruikt voor veel dingen; kracht(energie), transport, genezen, mind control, klimaat enz. De Sphinx is ook gebouwd door de Antlanteanen (ook hetzelfde tijd als de pyramide). De Sphinx is bedoeld als tempel. Onder de sphinx zijn registers (records) begraven.
Uitgebreider; waarvoor dienen de pyramiden?
Allereerst:
De Antlanteaanse bevolking bestond voor een lange periode en leefden uitgebreid over de wereld (het is niet persé zo dat ze alleen leefden op het ''Continent van Atlantis''). Blijkbaar was interplanetair reizen (reizen van planeet tot planeet) voor Antlanteanen net zo makkelijk als het is voor ons om de winkel om het hoekje te bezoeken. Ze hadden bases op de maan en bases op Mars; ook de monumenten op de maan en Mars zijn van de Antlanteaanse volk (..are Antlantean in origin). Ze hadden ook grote kristallen (giant crystals) op de maan en mars. Die werden gebruikt voor het verzamelen/absorberen van kosmische en solar energie als een energiebron (power source).
Waarom waren deze kristallen niet vernietigd tijdens de catalysmen (natuurrampen) die Atlantis heeft vernietigd? Dat komt omdat de functie van deze kristallen; het absorberen en veranderen van (heel veel) energie (... massive amounts of energy interacting with them is absorbed and transmuted...); hen eigenlijk heeft bewaard. Als je bijvoorbeeld een atoombom laat afgaan op een van zo'n kristal, dan zou het alle energie dat er ontstaat absorberen en het veranderen (in iets anders) (transduce).
Of we kunnen proberen te ontcijferen hoe zo'n kristal werkt met onze huidige technologie... nou ben er niet zeker van hoor, stel jezelf eens deze vraag maar : ''Zou een Neanderthaler kunnen weten hoe een Boeing 747 werkt?''.
Dus, als we over de Atlanteanen praten, praten we over een super ontwikkeld/gevorderde bevolking/civilisatie en de afstammelingen van hen. Na de verwoesting dat gebeurde en dit prachtige cultuur heeft vernietigd, ontstonden deze pyramid-achtige vormen (...built these pyramidal shapes...).
Deze pyramid-achtige vormen hebben eigenlijk dezelfde functie als de pyramid-vormige kristallen, maar deze werken wel minder krachtig. Met andere woorden: De pyramiden zijn gewoonweg gigantische machines. Ze werden gebruikt voor het manipuleren (dus eigenlijk veranderen) van energie tot: controle over het weer, energie/kracht geven aan de vele dingen dat een bevolking nodig heeft, bescherming, transmuteren/veranderen en genezen (They were used to manipulate energy to control weather, power the many things that a civilization requires to be considered "advanced," to preserve and transmute or heal).
Het is eigenlijk net zoals een soort bron van energie die gebruikt kan worden voor allerlei toepassingen, net zo als wij dat hebben met elektriciteit. Maar, het is nog steeds een stapje onder dan de veel gevorderde Atlanteaanse technologie. Met het groeien der jaren (...and as time went by...) gebeurde veel andere dingen en zelfs deze kennis was verloren.
October 20, 1994 F***, Laura and V***
Q: Sitchen says that the pyramid was built as a permanent marking
system to navigate the planets of our solar system. Could you give
comments on this please?
A: It was not built for that.
October 20, 1994 F***, Laura and V***
Q: (L) Zecariah Sitchen proposes that the pyramid was built as a
permanent marking system to navigate the solar system, could you
comment on that idea?
A: That is incorrect. The pyramids were built as energy storage and
transference facilities. They were built by the descendants of those
known to you as the Atlanteans who are, of course, your ancestors
in soul matters. They were not built to be markers for anything.
----------------Vertaling------------------
Volgens Zecariah Sitchen (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zecharia_Sitchin)is de pyramide gebouwd als een soort navigatiesysteem, een systeem dat de planeten van onze zonnestelsel kan ''aankruisen'' (permanent marking system to navigate the planets of our solar system). Hoe mooi dit ook klinkt, het is niet hier voor gemaakt. Zoals de Cassiopaeans zeggen: ''De pyramiden zijn gebouwd als een soort opslagruimte voor energie (dus dat ze energie bewaren en absorberen, zoals je hierboven hebt gelezen). Ze zijn gebouwd door de afstammelingen van (de door jou bekende) Antlanteanen en die zijn, natuurlijk, je voorouders in ziel stof (soul matters) (wij leven eigenlijk in body matters, denk ik). Ze zijn niet gebouwd om als een soort markeersysteem (navigatiesysteem) te werken.
**Opmerking**:
Ze zeggen:
''They were built by the descendants of those known to you as the Atlanteans...''. :
''Ze zijn gebouwd door de afstammelingen van (de door jou bekende) Antlanteanen''
Ze zeggen niet: ''They were built by the Antlanteans'' : ''Ze zijn gebouwd door de Antlanteanen''.
Dus ze zijn eigenlijk gebouwd door de afstammelingen van de Antlanteanen! Zoals ik eerder heb geschreven: ''Dus, als we over de Atlanteanen praten, praten we over een super ontwikkeld/gevorderde bevolking/civilisatie en de afstammelingen van hen.''
**Opmerking**:
Ik heb het veel over de pyramiden, maar ik ga het ook nu en dan over de Sphinx hebben (zoals je in het begin las en op het plaatje zag/ziet). De Sphinx informatie kan je (vanaf nu) zien met een ¤-tekentje ervoor. Ook is het belangrijk dat je niet gewoon blindeloos mijn vertalingen leest, maar ook voor jezelf nadenkt en jezelf ook vragen stelt he! Ook voor jezelf denken!
October 20, 1994 F***, Laura and V***
Q: (L) Would the great pyramid in Egypt still work if someone knew
how to use it?
A: It still works today even though it isn't being artificially used. It
was also a preservative chamber. If you were to walk inside the
confines of the great pyramid and then leave the body, your body
would retain its structure for quite some time. This ability has
contributed to the preservation of the actual structure.
¤Q: (L) What did the original face on the sphinx look like?
¤A: Looked like a representation of a feline and a human.
----------------Vertaling------------------
Laura vroeg of de great pyramide in Egypte nog steeds zou werken als iemand wist hoe die gebruikt kon worden. De Cassiopaeans antwoorden hierop: ''Het werkt nog steeds, ook al wordt het niet echt gebruikt.
Het was ook een bescherm (preservative) kamer. (Dus dat het bescherming biedt). Als je er in loopt, in het gebied van de great pyramid en dan je lichaam verlaat, wordt het structuur van je lichaam voor een vrij lange tijd bewaard (ik denk dus, dat je lichaam niet snel vergaat). Deze mogelijkheid komt eigenlijk door de bescherming van de werkelijke structuur (This ability has contributed to the preservation of the actual structure).''
¤ De originele gezicht van de sphinx ziet eruit als (een respresentatie van) een katachtige en een mens.
November 2, 1994 F***, Laura and V***
Q: (L) Why did the Egyptians draw sideways?
A: Atlantean method handed down. Simply artistic stylization.
Q: (L) What about the passages in the pyramid. Why so odd?
A: Used energy vortex for movement. Floated, levitated. Can still do
this if you know how. In the pyramid the passages created the
energy by their placement and relationship to other space/solid
configurations. And passages sometimes changed their structure
atomically and still do.
**Opmerking**:
handed-down = having been passed along from generation to generation. : Dus dat het van generatie tot generatie wordt doorgegeven (in dit geval : het zijwaartse schrijven van de egyptenaren).
vortex = ''Een vortex of (lucht)wervel is een draaiende beweging in een fluïdum.'' (http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex)
atomically = herken je het woord atoom hierin? Ja dat is een heeel klein deeltje dat minstens uit een proton en neutron bestaat die alleen of samen met soortgelijke of andere atomen een molecule vormt (vraag maar aan je natuurkunde leraar!) Dus (hier:) atomically betekent eigenlijk op nucleaire wijze.
----------------Vertaling------------------
De Egyptenaren tekenen zijwaarts/zijdelings omdat dat de Antlanteaanse methode is die van generatie tot generatie is doorgegeven. Simpelweg een artistieke manier (van schrijven)!
Daarna vraagt Laura waarom de paragrafen (dus delen van tekst) in de pyramiden er zo uit zien. ''Waarom zo raar?'', vraagt ze. Nu komt er iets moeilijk, ik probeer het zo goed mogelijk te vertalen!:
''Energie vortex (werveling, maalstroom) werd er gebruikt voor beweging. Zweven als het ware. Dit kan nog steeds als je wist hoe. In de pyramide creeërde de paragrafen de energie door hun plaatsing en door de verband die ze hebben met andere solidaire(vaste)/ruimte configuraties (samenstel van figuren/geheel waarin de delen op een bepaalde wijze geordend zijn). De paragrafen veranderden soms hun structuur op nucleaire wijze en dat doen ze nog steeds.
**Opmerking**:
Ik ga nu de sessies vertalen op de manier hoe zij zijn geschreven, misschien leest dat beter!
November 2, 1994 F***, Laura and V***
Q: (L) What is the purpose of the Sarcophagus in the "Kings"
chamber?
A: Energy storage.
Q: (L) Was there ever anything in this object?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What?
A: Many things.
Q: (L) So, there was nothing permanent in it, you could put various things in it for various reasons?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) In our machinery we generally have dials and tuners which
can adjust the machine to do a specific job or deliver a particular
amount or flow of energy. What was the equivalent of dials and
tuning devices in the pyramid?
A: Thoughts.
Q: (L) Was it the thoughts of a person in there or of a specific individual whose job it was to do this "thinking?"
A: Both on occasion.
Q: (L) Could just anybody go into the pyramid, get into this
sarcophagus, and have something done to them as they specified?
Or, was it the culmination of some other long process?
A: All.
Q: (L) When you say that the passages changed atomically, did you
mean that they might actually become larger or smaller?
A: Yes. And change position as well.
----------------Vertaling------------------
Q: (L) Wat is het doel van de Sarkofaag (grafkist in het oude Egypte) in de ''Koningen'' ?
(Dus wat is de doel van de grafkist, maar ik weet niet precies wat ze bedoelt met ''Kings'', jij wel? (misschien een kamer van een pyramide?))
Oh kijk is hier: http://www.godsplan-today.com/English/E … ssages.htm dan zie je staan+foto ''The Coffer in the King's Chamber.'' Misschien bedoelt ze dat.
A: Als opbergplaats voor energie.
Q: (L) Was er ooit iets in dit object (Sarkofaag)?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Wat dan?
A: Veel dingen.
Q: (L) Dus, er zat niks permanents (voor altijd/voortdurend) erin, je kon er verschillende dingen erin doen voor verschillende redenen?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) In onze machinerie gebruiken we wijzerplaten en afstemknoppen die de/een machine kunnen regelen (dus hoe wij machines besturen/gebruiken) om een bepaalde beweging of iets uit te voeren of een bepaald hoeveelheid energie of een stroom van energie kan geven. Wat is de equivalent (=gelijkwaardig) van wijzerplaten en afstemknoppen (zoals wij die hebben) in de pyramide?
**Opmerking**:
dial = wijzerplaat (= plaat met een verdeling erop waarover de wijzer van een instrument zich beweegt) , kiesschaaf
A: Gedachten.
Q: (L) Waren het de gedachten van een persoon daarin of een specifieke iemand die als baan had om dit te doen, dus de ''Gedachten-werk''?
A: Beide (bij gelegenheid).(Both on occasion.)
Q: (L) Kan gewoon iemand in de pyramide gaan, in deze Sarkofaag instappen, en datgene met ze doen zoals zij het beschreven? Of had het te maken met iets anders (hoogtepunt) dat een langere proces heeft? (culmination of some other long process)
A: Alles (allemaal).
Q: (L) Wanneer je zei dat de paragrafen veranderen op een nucleaire wijze (atomically -> atoom) (weet je nog?), bedoelde je dan dat ze werkelijk groter of kleiner worden?
A: Ja. En ze veranderen ook van positie.
Samenvatting:
De Sarkofaag in de ''Koningen's Kamer'' (''Kings'' chamber) is eigenlijk bedoeld als opbergplaats voor energie. Er zaten(/zitten?) veel dingen in de sarkofaag, maar niet permanent. De equivalent van wijzerplaten en afstemknoppen (voor duidelijkheid; zie boven) in de pyramide zijn gedachten. Het waren de gedachten van een persoon en van een specifieke iemand die als baan had om de ''Gedachten-werk'' te doen, allebei bij gelegenheid. De paragrafen die op nucleaire wijze veranderen, worden groter of kleiner én ze veranderen van positie.
November 4, 1994 F*** and Laura
Q: (L) Why were there 3 pyramids. Did they each have separate
purposes?
A: Variance in energy levels and age. Did you research about the
1967 engineer's study yet?
Q: (L) What book would that be in?
A: Look at Mystery volume. Now, please.
----------------Vertaling------------------
Q: (L) Waarom waren er drie pyramides. Had elke van ze verschillende doeleinde?
A: Verschillen in energie levels en leeftijd. Heb je al de ingenieurs onderzoek/studie van 1967 al onderzocht?
Q: (L) In welke boek staat dat erin?
A: Kijk in Mystery volume. Nu, alstublieft.
**Opmerking**:
Het volgende stukje gaat vooral over de kristallen, waar we het net over hadden. Het begin begint even over iets anders.
Het kristallen-stukje begint bij: »» ... ««
Q: November 19, 1994 F***, Laura, V***, T*** and J**
(T) Is the government planning to stage an invasion by aliens to
cause the populace of the world to go into such a fear state that they
will accept total control and domination?
A: Open. But if so, will "flop".
Q: (T) Why?
A: Many reasons: 1. Visual effects will be inadequate and will have
"glitches". 2. Real invasion may take place first. 3. Other events may
intercede.
Q: (T) Such as what?
A: Earth changes.
Q: (T) Am I correct in assuming that some of these hot-shot, big-wig
guys in the government who have plans for taking over the whole
world and making everything all happy and hunky-dory with them in
charge, are just simply not in synch with the fact that there are some
definite earth changes on the agenda? Are they missing something
here?
A: Close. They are aware but in denial.
Q: (T) Are these earth changes going to occur prior to the arrival of
the cometary cluster?
A: No. But "time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined.
Q: (T) Am I correct in saying that if they knew what was really going
to happen that they would still continue with their stupid little plans to
make money and try to control the world?
A: Yes. Greed is a sickness.
Q: (T) Is there such a thing as "alternative three" the plan to take all
the brains off the planet?
A: No.
Q: (T) Is that more disinformation?
»» A: Yes. So is Mars landing but not Mars monuments. ««
Q: (TL) Who made the monuments on Mars?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) So, the Atlanteans had inter-planetary ability?
A: Yes. With ease. Atlantean technology makes yours look like the
Neanderthal era.
Q: (T) Who created the structures on the moon that Richard
Hoagland has discovered?
A: Atlanteans.
Q: (T) What did they use these structures for?
A: Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as in
monuments or statuary.
Q: (T) What statuary are you referring to?
A: Example is face.
Q: (T) What power did these crystals gather?
A: Sun.
Q: (T) Was it necessary for them to have power gathering stations
on Mars and the Moon. Did this increase their power?
A: Not necessary but it is not necessary for you to have a million
dollars either. Get the correlation? Atlanteans were power hungry
the way your society is money hungry.
Q: (T) Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their
downfall?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Did they lose control of this power?
A: It overpowered them the same way your computers will
overpower you.
Q: (V) Is it similar to them gaining a life and intelligence of their
own?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) You mean these crystalline structures came to life, so to
speak?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And then what did they do?
A: Destroyed Atlantis.
Q: (L) But I thought that Atlantis was destroyed because of the close
passage of another body of the solar system?
A: Was damaged but recovered.
Q: (L) So Atlantis was damaged by a close passage of Mars or
whatever and then recovered from that damage, is that correct?
A: Part of landmass, but not all, was destroyed.
Q: (L) So, how many separate destructions did Atlantis experience?
A: Three.
Q: (L) One was caused by the close passage of Mars?
A: Yes. And comets.
Q: (L) Was Mars and the comets loosely interactive?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And the second was caused by what?
A: Venus.
Q: (L) And the third and final destruction was caused by what?
A: Crystals.
Q: (T) Are the crystals still active?
A: Bermuda triangle.
Q: (L) I thought that was a myth?
A: No.
Q: (L) And what does that crystal do? Is it continuously active?
A: No. Erratic.
Q: (L) Is it still active in the sense of being a conscious or sentient
entity?
A: No.
Q: (L) What activates it?
A: Many factors.
Q: (L) And when it is activated, what does it do?
A: Transdimensional window is blasted open.
Q: (L) Say a person was sailing along in the Bermuda Triangle and
the window was blasted open and these people passed through or
were engulfed in it or whatever, in what condition would they find
themselves?
A: Something akin to suspended animation.
Q: (L) Would they be conscious of their state of suspended
animation or would their consciousness also be suspended?
A: Either or.
Q: (L) Do they stay in this state forever, or do they come back out, or
do they come out somewhere else?
A: Open. All are possible. Same thing happened to Philadelphia
experiment participants.
Q: (L) If an individual were in this interdimensional state of
suspended animation, does this mean they are stuck there forever?
A: Maybe.
Q: (L) Can they not die, is that what you are saying?
A: To them they may perceive something like waiting for millions of
years.
Q: (L) Is there no one or no way to rescue them from this state?
A: Why do you think those sailors were hopelessly insane?
Q: (L) Besides the crystal in the Bermuda Triangle, are any of the
others still active?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Does the government know about them?
A: Semi.
Q: (L) Where are the others located?
A: Off Japan; in Brazil; in Ural mountains of Russia; North and South
Poles.
Q: (T) Are the ones on the Moon and Mars active also?
A: Yes.
Q: (V) Are they responsible for any of the earthquakes like the one
in Japan?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) If one crystal is found and the technology is deciphered, and
another is found, does it increase the power...
A: Let us answer this way: If Neanderthals found a 747 would they
know how to use it?
Q: (L) What were the physical dimensions of these crystals and
were they cut or naturally grown?
A: Varied. Were synthetic.
Q: (L) Were they faceted?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) In their faceting, what was the general configuration?
A: Pyramid.
Q: (L) Was that an absolute pyramid with the same proportions as
say, the Great Pyramid at Gizeh?
A: Close.
Q: (L) How large was the largest from base to apex?
A: 5000 feet.
Q: (L) What was the average size?
A: 500 feet.
Q: (L) And was the one that was 5,000 feet tall, is that one still in
existence?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Where is that one located?
A: 380 miles due East of you?
Q: (L) Some years ago a pilot reported seeing a pyramid near there
in the water...
A: That is just the top sticking out of the ocean floor. It is 90 per cent
buried.
Q: (V) In meditation, I saw crystals coming up during Earth changes.
Is this what is going to happen?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) How come this crystal didn't shatter or break up during the
subsidence of Atlantis?
A: Extraordinarily strong. An atomic bomb would not shatter it. The
chain reaction of a thermonuclear explosion would be absorbed into
the crystal and transferred into pure energy. That relates to the
design function.
Q: (L) And then what would happen?
A: Energy dispersal unless focused as engineered by the
Atlanteans.
Q: (L) Where did they get this technology?
A: They evolved it.
Q: (L) They invented it themselves?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did they interact with any aliens?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) Did they get any help at all from these extraterrestrials?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) And who were these aliens?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) What kind of power frequency did these crystals use?
A: Full range.
Q: (T) How many of the crystals have been discovered by the
governments of the world?
A: All.
Q: (T) Are they trying to use them?
A: Pointlessly.
Q: (T) Are they trying?
A: Maybe.
Q: (T) Is that why they backed off from the Moon and stopped the
space program?
A: No. Government doesn't understand technology.
Q: (T) Have they backed off from their activities on the Moon?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Are the crystals on Mars why they want to get there so badly?
A: Yes.
Q: (T) Because of the crystals or because of what is stored in the
monuments?
A: Neither.
Q: (T) Why do they want to get to Mars?
A: Explore.
Q: (T) Are the top echelons of the human race all the fools that they
seem?
A: Subjective.
Q: (L) Can we utilize that crystalline shape to generate electricity?
A: Possible and has been done.
Q: (L) Is it complicated?
A: Yes.
Q: (L) What effect does wearing hematite have on the physical
body?
A: Open.
----------------Vertaling------------------
Q: (T) Is de regering van plan om een invasie door aliens te leiden (to stage) om te veroorzaken dat de populatie van de wereld in zo'n grote staat van angst komt dat ze totale controle en overheersing/heerschappij zullen accepteren?
A: Open. Zo wel, zal het niet lukken (een flop worden).
**Opmerking**:
Met ''Open'' bedoelen ze vaak dat de vraagsteller niet klaar is voor het antwoord of dat het antwoord te ingewikkeld is om te begrijpen. Of dat het dichtbij het antwoord is.
Q: (T) Waarom?
A: Vele redenen:
1. Zichtbare/visuele effects zullen ontoereikend (ongeschikt voor het beoogde doel) worden en zullen foutjes krijgen.(Visual effects will be inadequate and will have ''glitches".)
2. Een echte invasie kan eerst (eerder) gebeuren.
3. Andere (belangrijke) gebeurtenissen/evenementen kunnen er tussen komen.
Q: (T) Zoals?(welke gebeurtenissen)
A: Aarde verandert=> Aarde-veranderingen (veranderingen op aarde). (Earth changes) (Ik denk, zoals bijv. cataclysmen)
Q: (T): Heb ik gelijk als ik veronderstel/aanneem dat sommige van deze ''hoge pieten''- mannen in de regering die van plan zijn om de hele wereld over te nemen en alles ''gelukkig'', zus en zo maken met hen als leidinggevers, gewoon simpelweg niet gelijk lopen met het feit dat er sommige definitieve aarde veranderingen gaan gebeuren? Missen ze hier iets? (Dus hebben zij wel in de gaten dat de veranderingen van de aarde hun plannen kunnen dwarsbomen?)
A: Close. Ze zijn ervan bewust, maar zijn in ontkenning.
**Opmerking**:
Met ''Close'' bedoelen ze vaak dat het antwoord dichtbij is, dus bijna helemaal klopt.
Q: (T) Gaan deze aarde veranderingen vóór de komst van de kometen cluster gebeuren?
A: Nee, maar ''tijd'' frame is, als nog, onbepaald/onzeker. ("time" frame is, as of yet, undetermined)
Q: (T) Heb ik gelijk als ik zeg dat als ze wel wistten wat er echt zal gebeuren, dat ze dan toch door zouden gaan met hun domme kleine plannen voor geld en controle over de hele wereld?
A: Ja. Hebzucht is een ziekte. (Greed is a sickness)
Q: (T) Is er zoiets als een ''alternatieve/keuze drie'' (''alternative three'') de plan om alle hersens van de planeet af te pakken? (take all the brains off the planet).
A: Nee.
Q: (T) Is dat meer desinformatie(valse/misleidende informatie) ?
A: Ja. Net als de Mars landing, maar niet de Mars monumenten.
Q: (TL) Wie heeft de monumenten op Mars gemaakt?
**Opmerking**:
monument = groot gedenkteken of beschermd of te beschermen overblijfsel van vroegere cultuur, nijverheid of wetenschap
A: De Atlanteanen.
Q: (T) Dus de Atlanteanen hadden een inter-planetair bevoegdheid/vermogen? (Dus of ze de mogelijkheid hadden om van planeet naar planeet te reizen).
A: Ja. Met gemak. Als je de Atlanteaanse technologie met die van jullie vergelijkt, dan is die van jullie nog in de Neanderthaal tijdperk.
Q: (T) Wie heeft de bouwsels (structures) op de maan, die Richard Hoagland (http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.p … ._Hoagland) heeft ontdekt, gemaakt?
A: Atlanteanen.
Q: (T) Waarvoor gebruikten ze deze bouwsels (structures) voor?
A: Energie overbrengen (/opname) (of veranderen) punten voor kristalachtige vermogen/symbolisme als in monumenten of beeldwerk. (Energy transfer points for crystalline power/symbolism as in monuments or statuary.)
Q: (T) Naar welke beeldwerk verwijs je?
A: Een voorbeeld is het gezicht (face).
**Opmerking**:
Met ''face'' bedoelen ze vast het gezicht op Mars (face on Mars):
http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.p … ce_on_Mars
Q: (T) Wat voor vermogen verzamelden (gather) deze kristallen?
A: Zon.
Q: (T) Was het noodzakelijk voor hun om deze vermogen-verzamelende stations op Mars en de Maan te hebben? Verhoogt dit hun vermogen (Did this increase their power?)?
A: Niet noodzakelijk, maar het is ook niet noodzakelijk voor jou om één miljoen dollar te hebben. Begrijp je de correlatie (verhouding van onderlinge afhankelijkheid of beïnvloeding)? Atlanteanen waren vermogen-honger net als jouw maatschappij geld-honger is.
Q: (T) Was de op(een-)hoping/verzameling van dit vermogen (ook) de oorzaak van hun ondergang?(Was the accumulation of this power what brought about their downfall?)
A: Ja.
Q: (T) Verloren zij controle over dit vermogen?
A: Het nam de macht over hen, net als dat computers over jou de macht gaan krijgen. (It overpowered them the same way your computers will overpower you.)
Q: (V) Is het gelijkvormig aan dat ze zelf een leven krijgen en intelligentie? (Zoals dat bij robots kan gebeuren , vandaar ''gelijkvormig'')
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Bedoel je dat deze kristalachtige structuren als het ware tot levend kwamen?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) En wat deden ze?
A: Atlantis vernietigd.
Q: (L) Maar ik dacht dat Atlantis vernietigd werd door de dichtbij koming van een andere hemellichaam van het zonnestelsel (the close passage of another body of the solar system)?
A: Was beschadigd, maar hersteld.
Q: (L) Dus Atlantis was beschadigd door een dichtbij-koming van Mars ofzo en toen is Atlantis hersteld van de beschadiging, klopt dat?
A: Deel van het landmassa, maar niet alles, was vernietigd.
Q: (L) Dus, hoeveel aparte vernietigingen heeft Atlantis meegemaakt?
A: Drie.
Q: (L) Een was veroorzaakt door een dichtbij koming van Mars (close passage of Mars)?
A: Ja. En kometen.
Q: (L) Was Mars en de kometen vrij-van-elkaar interactief (op elkaar inwerkend)? (Was Mars and the comets loosely interactive?)
A: Ja.
Q: (L) En de tweede was veroorzaakt door...
A: Venus.
Q: (L) En de derde en laatste vernietiging was veroorzaakt door... ?
A: Kristallen.
Q: (T) Zijn de kristallen nog steeds actief?
A: De Bermuda driehoek (Bermuda triangle).
**Opmerking**:
De Bermuda driehoek, wie kent het niet? Ik zal toch een link daarover plaatsen:
http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.p … a_triangle
Q: (L) Ik dacht dat dat een mythe was?
A: Nee.
Q: (L) En wat doet dit kristal? Is het continu actief?
A: Nee. Onregelmatig (Dus dat dit kristal onregelmatig actief is.)
Q: (L) Is het nog steeds actief in de betekenis van een bewuste of gevoelhebbend entiteit/wezen?(Is het dus actief als een bewuste of gevoelhebbend entiteit?)
A: Nee.
Q: (L) Wat activeert het?
A: Veel factoren (factor = medebepalend element, omstandigheid (kracht enz.) die meewerkt om iets in het leven te roepen zoals het is).
Q: (L) En als het is geactiveerd, wat doet het dan?
A: Transdimensionaal window ''ontploft'' open. (Er ''ontstaat'' dus een transdimensionaal window (window = raam). (Transdimensional window is blasted open.)
Q: (L) Laten we zeggen dat een persoon aan het zeilen is in de Bermuda Driehoek en de (Transdimensionaal) window open ''ontploft'' en deze mensen er doorheen gaan of erdoor zijn opgeslokt ofzo, in wat voor staat bevinden ze zich dan? (in what condition would they find themselves)
A: Iets zoals schijndood. (schijndood = toestand van organische wezens waarbij het leven tijdelijk ophoudt duidelijk herkenbare verschijnselen te vertonen, terwijl het vermogen van voort te leven blijft bestaan)
Q: (L) Zouden ze bewust zijn van hun schijndood-toestand of hoort hun bewustheid ook bij de schijndood?
A: De een of de ander.
Q: (L) Zitten ze voor altijd in die toestand, of komen ze eruit, of komen ze ergens anders eruit?
A: Open. Ze zijn allemaal mogelijk. Hetzelfde is gebeurd met de Philadelphia experiment deelnemers.
**Opmerking**:
Philadelphia experiment:
NL: http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philadelphia_Experiment
ENG: http://www.cassiopedia.org/wiki/index.p … experiment
Q: (L) Als een individueel in deze interdimensionaal toestand van schijndood bevindt, betekent dit dan dat die individueel daar voor altijd ''vast'' zit?
A: Misschien.
Q: (L) Kunnen ze niet doodgaan, is dat wat je zegt?
A: Voor hun is het bijvoorbeeld alsof het is wachten voor miljoenen jaren.
Q: (L) Kan niemand hen redden van deze toestand, is er geen manier om hen te redden?
A: Waarom denk je dat die zeilers hopeloos krankzinnig waren? (Why do you think those sailors were hopelessly insane?)
Q: (L) Behalve de kristal in de Bermuda Driehoek, zijn de andere kristallen nog actief?
A: Ja.
Q: (T) Weet de regering daarvan? (Does the government know about them?)
A: Half. (Semi)
Q: (L) Waar zijn de andere (kristallen) gelokaliseerd/gevestigd?
A: In de buurt van Japan; in Brazilië, in de Oeralgebergte van Rusland; Noord en Zuid polen.
**Opmerking**:
De Oeralgebergte in Rusland (Ural mountains):
Q: (T) Zijn de kristallen op de Maan en Mars ook actief?
A: Ja.
Q: (V) Zijn ze verantwoordelijk voor sommige aardbevingen, zoals die ene in Japan? (Are they responsible for any of the earthquakes like the one in Japan?)
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Als een kristal is gevonden en de technologie is ontcijferd, en er nog een kristal is gevonden, neemt de vermogen... dan toe...
A: Laten we zo beantwoorden: Als Neanderthalen een 747 vinden, zouden zij weten hoe zij het moeten gebruiken?
Q: (L) Wat waren de lichamelijke dimensies (physical dimensions) van deze kristallen en waren ze gesneden of natuurlijk gegroeid?
**Opmerking**:
dimension = afmeting, dimensie, omvang, grootte
Dus ik denk dat ze met ''lichamelijke dimensies'' bedoelt, hoe groot enz. de kristallen zijn; de afmetingen dus.
A: Verschillend. Ze waren synthetisch (dus niet natuurlijk gegroeid...).
Q: (L) Waren ze geslepen (faceted)?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Over het slijpen, wat was de algemene vorm?
A: Pyramide.
Q: (L) Was dat een volledig pyramide met dezelfde afmetingen/vorm als, laten we zeggen, de Great Pyramid in Gizeh?
A: Close.
Q: (L) Hoe groot was de grootste van de basis tot de top?
A: 1.52 km. (5000 feet)
Q: (L) Wat was de gemiddelde grootte?
A: 152.4 m (0.15 km). (500 feet)
Q: (L) En die ene die 1.52 km groot was, bestaat die nog?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Waar is die gelokaliseerd/gevestigd?
A: 115,8 m in het Oosten van jou? (380 miles due East of you?)
Q: (L) Wat jaren geleden meldde een piloot dat hij daar (dus die 115,8 m verder) een pyramide zag dichtbij het water...
A: Dat is alleen maar de top die eruit steekt (van de oceaan bodem). Het is 90% begraven.
Q: (V) In meditatie, zag ik kristallen naar boven komen tijdens de Aarde-veranderingen. Is dit wat er gaat gebeuren?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Hoe komt het dat deze kristallen niet in stukken vlogen of gebroken zijn tijdens het zinken van Atlantis?
A: Buitengewoon sterk. Een atoombom zou het niet kunnen breken. De kettingreactie van een thermonucleair explosie zou worden geabsorbeerd in de kristal en overgebracht (dus eigenlijk verandert) worden in pure energie. Dat heeft betrekking op de (ontwerp) functie.
Q: (L) En wat gebeurt er dan?
A: Energie verspreiding, tenzij geconcentreerd/gevestigd als bewerkt door de Atlanteanen. (Energy dispersal unless focused as engineered by the Atlanteans.)
Q: (L) Waar hebben ze deze technologie vandaan?
A: Zij ontwikkelden het.
Q: (L) Zij hadden het zelf uitgevonden?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Hadden ze contact (interact with) met aliens?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) Kregen ze hulp van deze buitenaardse wezens?
A: Ja.
Q: (L) En wie waren deze buitenaardse wezens?
A: Lizards.
Q: (L) Wat voor vermogen frequentie (power frequency) gebruikten deze kristallen?
A: Hoogste reikwijdte/afstand. (Full range)
Q: (T) Hoeveel kristallen zijn al ontdekt door de regeringen van de wereld?
A: Allemaal.
Q: (T) Zijn ze aan het proberen ze te gebruiken?
A: Nutteloos.
Q: (T) Proberen ze?
A: Misschien.
Q: (T) Is dat de reden dat ze zich hebben teruggetrokken van de Maan en de space programma hebben gestopt? (Is that why they backed off from the Moon and stopped the space program?)
A: Nee. De regering begrijpt de technologie niet.
Q: (T) Hebben ze zich teruggetrokken van hun activiteiten op de Maan?
A: Open.
Q: (T) Zijn de kristallen op Mars de reden waarom ze daar zo graag heen willen gaan?
A: Ja.
Q: (T) Vanwege de kristallen of wat er in de monumenten zouden kunnen zijn?
A: Geen van beiden.
Q: (T) Waarom willen ze naar Mars?
A: Onderzoeken. (Explore)
Q: (T) Zijn de top groepen/rangen van de mensenras allemaal idioten? (Are the top echelons of the human race all the fools that they seem?)
A: Subjecief.
Q: (L) Kunnen we de kristallenvorm nuttig gebruiken om elektriciteit op te wekken?
A: Mogelijk en is al gedaan.
Q: (L)Is het ingewikkeld?
A: Ja.
Samenvatting:
Als de regering van plan is om een invasie door aliens te leiden om te veroorzaken dat de populatie van de wereld in zo'n grote staat van angst komt dat ze totale controle en overheersing/heerschappij zullen accepteren, zal het niet lukken. Hiervoor zijn vele redenen:
De zichtbare effects zullen dan ontoereikend worden en zullen foutjes krijgen.
Een echte invasie kan eerder gebeuren of andere (belangrijke) gebeurtenissen kunnen er tussen komen. Gebeurtenissen zoals de Aarde-veranderingen.
De ''hoge pieten''-mannen in de regering zijn wel bewust van de aarde-veranderingen en dat die hun plannen kunnen dwarsbomen, maar ze zijn in ontkenning.
De monumenten op Mars zijn gemaakt door de Atlanteanen. De Antlanteanen konden namelijk makkelijk van de ene planeet naar het andere reizen.
De bouwsels op de maan, die Richard Hoagland heeft ontdekt zijn ook gemaakt door de Atlanteanen. Die bouwsels werden gebruikt voor het overbrengen/veranderen van energie voor kristalachtige vermogen/symbolisme, zoals monumenten of beeldwerk.
Een voorbeeld van zo'n beeldwerk is het gezicht: Face on Mars.
De kristallen verzamelden de zon als vermogen.
Omdat o.a. de Atlanteanen vermogen-honger waren (en wij geld-honger) was de opeenhoping/verzameling van dit vermogen ook een oorzaak van hun ondergang.
Ze verloren controle over dit vermogen. (Net als dat computers de macht over ons zullen krijgen). De kristallen 'leefden' als het waren, ze kregen intelligentie, ze werden bewust.
En toen vernietigden ze Atlantis.
Er waren 3 oorzaken, waardoor Atlantis ten onder is gegaan:
Een: Dichtbij koming van Mars (deel van het landmassa, maar niet alles, werd hierdoor vernietigd.)
Tweede: Door Venus.
Derde: De kristallen.
Hoe het komt dat deze kristallen niet in stukken vlogen of gebroken zijn tijdens het zinken van Atlantis? Ze zijn namelijk buitengewoon sterk. Een atoombom zou het niet kunnen breken. De kettingreactie van een thermonucleair explosie zou worden geabsorbeerd in de kristal en overgebracht (dus eigenlijk verandert) worden in pure energie. Dat heeft betrekking op de (ontwerp) functie.
(Na het absorberen van het vermogen en het overbrengen in pure energie, wordt de energie verspreid, tenzij geconcentreerd/gevestigd als bewerkt door de Atlanteanen.
De kristallen zijn nog steeds (onregelmatig) actief, zoals de Bermuda Driehoek.
Maar het is niet (meer) actief in de betekenis van een bewuste of gevoelhebbend
entiteit/wezen. De Bermuda Driehoek wordt geactiveerd door veel factoren.
Als het is geactiveerd, ''ontploft''een Transdimensionaal window open.
Als bijvoorbeeld een persoon aan het zeilen is in de Bermuda Driehoek en de (Transdimensionaal) window open ''ontploft'' en die persoon er doorheen gaat of erdoor wordt opgeslokt, dan bevindt die persoon in een staat, zoals de schijndood. De mensen die dan in die staat bevinden zijn bewust van hun schijndood-toestand, maar niet allemaal. Het is de een of de ander. Dit is ook gebeurd met de Philadelphia experiment deelnemers.
Het kan zijn dat een individueel die in zo'n interdimensionaal toestand van schijndood bevindt daar voor altijd 'vast' zit. Het is alsof ze wachten voor miljoenen jaren.
Niet alleen de Bermuda Driehoek is actief, maar ook de andere kristallen. De andere kristallen zijn bevestigd in de buurt van Japan, in Brazilië, in de Oeralgebergte van Rusland, de Noordpool en de Zuidpool. Ook de kristallen op de Maan en Mars zijn actief. Ze zijn ook verantwoordelijk voor sommige aardbevingen.
Als er een kristal is gevonden en men probeert de technologie te ontcijferen... zijn ze oneindig lang bezig.
Want, zou een Neanderthaler weten hoe zij een Boeing 747 moeten gebruiken?
De kristallen zijn synthetisch en niet natuurlijk gegroeid. Ze werden als het ware 'geslepen' (faceted). Ze werden 'geslepen' tot een Pyramide-vorm. Dat was de algemene vorm.
De grootste kristal van de basis tot de top is 1,52 (5000 feet) km groot. Deze is 90% begraven.
De gemiddelde grootte van een kristal was 152,4 m (500 feet).
Tijdens de Aarde-veranderingen die zullen komen zullen de kristallen naar boven komen.
Deze hoge technologie hadden de Atlanteanen zelf uitgevonden, zelf ontwikkeld.
Ze kregen wel hulp van buitenaardse wezens, namelijk de Lizards.
Alle kristallen zijn al ontdekt door de regeringen van de wereld. Als ze het proberen te gebruiken, is het nutteloos, omdat de regering simpelweg de technologie niet begrijpt.
Tot slot:
Q: (T) Was het noodzakelijk voor hun om deze vermogen-verzamelende stations op Mars en de Maan te hebben? Verhoogt dit hun vermogen (Did this increase their power?)?
A: Niet noodzakelijk, maar het is ook niet noodzakelijk voor jou om één miljoen dollar te hebben. Begrijp je de correlatie (verhouding van onderlinge afhankelijkheid of beïnvloeding)? Atlanteanen waren vermogen-honger net als jouw maatschappij geld-honger is.
...













