dinsdag 26 augustus 2008

[Article by SOTT] Connecting the Dots: A New Cold War Meets Chinese Lanterns Flying in the Wind of Change

Source - 2 Aug 2008

----------------------

© Gary Varvel

There is a well-known Chinese curse: May you live in interesting times. Judging from the rapid unfoldment of "interesting" world events, it is clear that we ain't seen nothing yet and whatever providence has in store for us, it surely is going to become curiouser and curiouser.

So what went on this month, other than more bloodshed, cynical manipulation and overt war propaganda?

The New Cold War

Many seemingly disconnected events of the month of July can be understood as manifestations of one grand theme: the alignment of countries and various power groups into two confronting gangs, in a way reminiscent of the Cold War. Perhaps you recall that last month Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov observed that his country and the US had more trust and respect for one another during the Cold War than they do now. He was right; some events have left us wondering if we inadvertently stepped into a time machine and popped out back in the 1960s. A case in point:
Russia would cross "a redline for the United States of America" if it were to base nuclear capable bombers in Cuba, a top US air force officer warned on Tuesday.

"If they did I think we should stand strong and indicate that is something that crosses a threshold, crosses a red line for the United States of America," said General Norton Schwartz, nominated to be the air force's chief of staff.

He was referring to a Russian news report that said the military is thinking of flying long-range bombers to Cuba on a regular basis. [...]

The newspaper Iszvestia on Monday cited an unnamed senior Russian air force official in Moscow as saying that Russia may start regular flights by long-range bombers to Cuba in response to US plans to install a missile defense system in eastern Europe.

Well, if it isn't the big guys playing chess with nuclear weapons again - assuming that they actually knocked it off for a while - and, in the process, exposing the lives of millions to instant and horrific deaths. Notice that this proves that it was never about rival political ideologies. Nope; it was about the pursuit of power, the only real motivation of psychopaths.

© Unknown

So we are going back to that ugly part of the human experiential cycle; although of course, cycles never repeat themselves in exactly the same way. This is a new version of the Cold War and we suspect specific reasons for this, as well as some sort of understanding among the parties at some level. But lets not get ahead of ourselves. Here is what the alignment is roughly looking like:

- The Axis of Evil: The United States, Israel, Great Britain and - alas - Sarkozy's France.

and, in the other corner:

- Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, Cuba, North Korea.

Here's why we think it aligns this way, explained point by point:

The Missile Fever

Condoleezza Rice signed a missile defense deal with the Czech Republic which permits the siting of a tracking radar station on Czech soil as part of an extended US missile shield. The argument is that this is needed to ward off potential attacks by those pesky 'rogue' states - you know, such as Iran - who pose "a common threat in the 21st century". Condi says that the radar system is not aimed at Russia; the problem is that the Czech Republic is at the doorstep of Russia and, let's face it, Iran poses no real missile threat to anyone. So it is a case of 'listen Peter, here's a message for Paul'.

As expected, Russia reacted by pointing out that the deal "complicates security issues on a global scale". The Russian Foreign Ministry warned in a statement that they "will be forced to react not with diplomatic, but with military-technical methods". No wonder that Russia is also trying to put its feet at the doorstep of the US, as mentioned above. And no wonder that Russia's new president, Dmitri Medvedev, doesn't take criticism from the US in very good spirits.

Notice that Russia is now increasingly concerned about its security, and has called for a broad new security alliance, "possibly including India and China, that would deal with problems such as terrorism and crime from Vladivostok, on Russia's eastern border, to Vancouver". The proposal was mentioned in a meeting with NATO ambassadors and it was interpreted by the media as an attempt by the Kremlin to usurp other alliances dominated by the US and Europe (i.e. NATO itself) - an explanation which actually makes sense, since it is for the benefit of Russia's safety that the West does not ally against it.

The Spy Fever

British security services have been busy with their own propaganda campaign against Russia - and Iran, but that's not news. It is very convenient that they can 'leak' information to the media without providing their names nor giving specifics; the message gets across and no anonymous source needs to take responsibility for anything. The Times published:

Britain's security services have identified Russia as the third most serious threat facing the country, it has emerged before Gordon Brown's first meeting with President Medvedev.

Security officials say that only al-Qaeda terrorism and Iranian nuclear proliferation are greater menaces to the country's safety than Russia.

The services are understood to fear that Russia's three main intelligence agencies have flooded the country with agents, The Times understands.

Talk about neuro-linguistic programming! Now Russia is mentioned in the same sentence as Iran and - shivers - al-Qaeda™, universally recognized as the pinnacle of evil. Furthermore, an article in The Telegraph claims that the "distraction" of combating Russian espionage "makes it significantly more likely that one of the many Islamist terror plots will succeed". Well, they couldn't blame Russia for sponsoring al-Qaeda™, as that would be too ridiculous, so they settled for second best: Russian spies are a "distraction", so if another bomb goes off in the UK, you know who is to blame!

© Unknown

Again, Russia took notice and retaliated by accusing Christopher Bowers, the acting director of UK Trade and Industry, of espionage. The information also appeared through 'media sources', while Russia's Federal Security Service (FSB) declined to make an official comment.

While this little propaganda war was taking place, Alex Allan, the chairman of the Joint Intelligence Committee of the UK, became "very seriously ill", went into a coma and was found covered in blood. His illness was treated as non-suspicious by the Counter Terrorism Command investigating it. Still, when the spy chief of one of the world's powers goes into coma for no apparent reason, with so many interesting things taking place in the world, we should all take notice. We are tempted to posit that it is something more than a simple illness, but exactly what that is, we do not know. In any case, Allan regained consciousness after ten days and the official story was that he had pneumonia and it was the prolonged coughing that brought up blood.

British tabloids, on the other hand, have their own theory. Yes, you guessed it: they are speculating that it was a Russian assassination attempt. It's funny how speculation doesn't usually make it to the media unless the hypotheses are convenient for the establishment. Then it's just a matter of repeating them endlessly until they sink into people's minds as 'facts'. Think about Saddam's non-existent weapons of mass destruction, for a recent example with catastrophic consequences.

It is possible that latest tensions with Russia are just a continuation of the power games that got wide exposure with the Litvenenko affair, or mere theatre as distraction. We suggest that you read our report on the case to get a better idea of tangled web of power that leads all the way back to the Middle East.

My Enemy's Friend is My Enemy

Back in June, Russia moved closer to Iran by signing a $2.5 billion deal to build airliners. Maybe this 'closeness' is the main factor that has moved the Axis of Evil to launch a campaign against Russia. We do not know how close Russia really is with Iran, but it is quite clear that Russia is not following the script for the Middle East as written and directed by the Ziocons in Tel Aviv and Washington. That has got to enrage some who are counting on the prophecies of their bloodthirsty god to be fulfilled on the strict schedule of some time within the next five years. On the other hand, they could be following the script given them exactly, the point being to distract the masses with a "new cold war."

So, true or not, Israeli defense 'sources' - and here we go with those sources again - claim that Iran will receive an advanced Russian-made anti-aircraft system by 2009. The problem, they say, is that it "could help fend off any preemptive strikes against its nuclear facilities". This is the spin Zionist style: having established through years of propaganda that Iran is 'evil' and intends to build nuclear weapons, and that a preemptive strike is therefore 'good', Russia is behaving badly by making things harder for Israel. Furthermore, there is an urgent deadline for this (2009), so let the Israeli Air Force take care of things right away! Not in vain have Israeli warplanes been practicing in Iraq as preparation for a strike on Iran! Nor has it gone unnoticed that Iran has been test-firing missiles in the Persian Gulf!

On top of that, how dare the Russians get closer to Venezuela and Cuba, the two 'bad weeds' in the US backyard that is Latin America?

These new alliances appear to be one of the main reasons (scripted or not) for the new Cold War, but they are not the only ones...

It's the Natural Resources, Stupid!

Another location Russia has been rushing to clearly establish its presence in is the Arctic. Even a US Coast Guard official warned that Russia was winning the "Arctic race". With tests of new weapons and a military buildup in the area to protect its "national interests", we were reminded of the strategic significance of the North Pole during the Cold War - being a shortcut between the Eastern and Western hemispheres. But then we stumbled upon this article:

Riches in the Arctic: the New Oil Race

New geological surveys show as much as a fifth of the world's undiscovered but exploitable gas and oil reserves lie under the Arctic ice. As the ice melts, the pristine wilderness could become 'the new Houston'.

The future of the Arctic will be less white wilderness, more black gold, a new report on oil reserves in the High North has signaled this week. The first-comprehensive assessment of oil and gas resources north of the Arctic Circle, carried out by American geologists, reveals that underneath the ice, the region may contain as much as a fifth of the world's undiscovered yet recoverable oil and natural gas reserves. [...]

The significance of the report is that it puts firm figures for the first time on the hydrocarbon riches which the five countries surrounding the Arctic - the US, Russia, Canada, Norway and Denmark (through its dependency, Greenland) - have been eying for several years.

Indeed, natural resources have been openly declared as the real interest of Russia in the Arctic - something worth fighting a war for, according to Lt. Gen. Vladimir Shamanov, head of the Defense Ministry's combat training directorate.

Thus, we find again the issue of oil. Just as the war on Iraq and the coming war on Iran are not exclusively about oil, the New World War is not exclusively about oil and other natural resources, though these are one of the driving reasons.

Oh well, here is where we get a bit philosophical about human nature. Are these psychopaths simply extremely greedy? After all, they do have all the power and money they want, don't they? They are certainly not interested in making their fellow countrymen rich, as they like the economic pyramid as steep as it can get without toppling. So we wonder, having acquired everything already, why would they want even more? It's almost as if they are grabbing as much as they can in the knowledge that the game may soon be over.

And perhaps it will be. Maybe they do know that they need to take as much as they can now, so that they can survive and live as comfortably as possible when the cosmic weather catches up with our delicate planet. Yes, once again we would like to call your attention to the evidence pointing to our spherical home - the Big Blue Marble - having been cyclically bombarded by comets and fireballs, and therefore the probability that this will happen again, perhaps much sooner than we would care to consider.

The G8 Circus - Or is That the Real Thing?

We have two main camps fighting for the world's resources: the usual Axis of Evil players (US, Israel, UK) and Russia-China-Venezuela-Iran-Korea camp. So why does Medvedev manage to make such a warm display of friendship with the other Axis of Evil gangsters during the G8 meeting?


© RIA Novosti, Dmitry Astakhov

Isn't that touching? They are already thinking about their next war(s) - yet they can't help the camaraderie when they meet. A month ago Kissinger went to see Medvedev and performed the same fraternal routine.

Conventional wisdom would indicate that experienced politicians have no problem smiling for the cameras. And that is indeed correct. Psychopaths can do everything in their power to destroy you, yet they somehow manage to come across as friendly - even to their victims. But wait! What if, for a change, we are reading the equation backwards? What if the so called 'rivalry' is nothing but a circus performance for the public and their camaraderie is the real thing?

If that's the case, then the picture that emerges is as follows:

Pathocrats perceive the larger society of normal people as their real enemies. They can recognize other pathological characters as similar to themselves, and so they ally with them to further their own pursuit of power. The most successful psychopaths - such as those heading governments - are very clever, so they know that it is necessary to build a house of mirrors to keep the rest of us guessing about what is really going on. And what is going on is that wars are useful to grab resources from the people, while at the same time re-engineering entire societies for their easier control and management.

Sarkozy's NATO Fever: a Timeline

A suicide at Ben Gurion Airport during Sarkozy's visit, a French soldier shooting at civilians during an army show, several nuclear leaks, Ingrid Betancourt being finally released; viva la France! Sarkozy has recently been in the middle of seemingly unrelated events. And they all signal his alignment with the Axis of Evil.

June 24th: You may recall the event in Ben Gurion airport, when a soldier located on the roof of a building and holding an M16 killed himself when Sarkozy was just 100 meters from him. The official story was suicide.

SOTT's alternative hypothesis: Mossad sent a strong message to Sarkozy: support NATO and the agenda for the Middle East.

So Sarkozy decides to obey his masters, but he faces two major problems. First, the Gaullist culture of the French army will prevent any integration into NATO, second the French public opinion is against an attack on Iran.

June 29th: During an army show in Carcassone, a soldier shoots several civilians. The soldier supposedly mixed up real bullets and fake bullets. Though real bullets weigh much more, their container doesn't have the same color and they are systematically counted when going in and out of the arsenal. Of course, the contraceptive box found filled with real bullets raises some more suspicions. Official story: accident due to the army incompetency.

SOTT's alternative hypothesis: it was a manufactured accident, useful to discredit the French army - unsympathetic to Sarkozy's plans - and to legitimize its integration in NATO.

© La Depeche du Midi
''A Strange Discovery''

July 1st: The French army's top officer, General Cuche resigns. Sarkozy accepts this resignation before any inquiry is conducted and before any judgment is pronounced. Sarkozy publicly scolds the army's representatives : "You're not professionals, you are amateurs".

© AFP
Sarkozy amongst French troops he eventually stabbed in the back

July 2nd: Franco-Colombian politician and hostage Ingrid Betancourt is released from Colombian rebels and Mossad seems to have played a major role in the operation. Official story: Mossad helped with the operation in order to stay on good terms with Colombia and the US (two US hostages were also released).

SOTT's alternative hypothesis: Sarkozy has proven his compliance with Israeli orders by firing France's top General and taking one more step towards NATO; in exchange and as a sign of 'good will' Mossad helped him gain some points in the popularity charts.

July 14th: Bastille Day and its usual army ceremonies. After Sarkozy insulted the army, drastically and unilaterally cut its budget and acknowledged submission to NATO, French soldiers display a rather loose demonstration in front of Sarkozy and his privileged guest Bashar Assad, the Syrian dictator. After being invaded by Israel, the Lebanese people must have been delighted by this news.

© AFP
Sarkozy showing the way towards submission under NATO diktats

July 18th: 28 kg of Semtex explosive are stolen. Official story: Some bad guys have taken advantage of the security weaknesses and stolen the explosives.

SOTT's alternative hypothesis: French citizens won't accept an invasion of Iran but a terror event à la 9-11 and the WTC attributed to an Islamist terrorist organization linked to Iran should change the French opinion right quick!

July 24th: Fillon, the French prime minister officially announces the reduction plan and the development of a Franco-German military unit. Who said embryonic European army? (These two articles are only available in French.) The days are numbered for the French army. Over the next three years 83 units will be destroyed.

July 30th : According to a survey conducted by CSA and Le Parisien, confidence in Sarkozy rose to 40% compared to 36% at the end of June.

No more explanations are needed; the sad case of a once strong and vitally important France becoming just another cog in the Fascist machine appears quite clear.

Some People Never Learn: Tony Blair Gets Another Warning

Apparently, Blair didn't get the first hint and required another reminder to be a good puppet. Who knew he would turn out to be such an undisciplined bad boy?

"Unfortunately Mr Blair has had to postpone his visit to Gaza due to a specific security threat which would have made it impossible to proceed," a spokesman for the former prime minister said of the last-minute decision...

An Israeli diplomatic source said Blair was informed by Israeli Defence Minister Ehud Barak "that there was a threat that could materialise as he entered the Gaza Strip"...

"The story of security threats was only an Israeli invention to prevent the visit," Abu Zuhri said. "Blair should have not accepted these silly allegations."

The problem is that we know he has no real intentions of helping Palestinians or confronting the Zionists. He is pretty much aware of being nice to those who butter his bread, no doubt. So why do the Israelis even bother to orchestrate those demonstrations, unless the rules of the power game require a seasonal reminder of who's the biggest bully on the block?

But we do want to turn your attention to one particular detail mentioned in the Jerusalem Post article:

Hamas was to have provided security for Blair's trip. Although Hamas has mostly pacified once lawless Gaza, shadowy extremist groups are still believed to operate in Gaza.

And we wonder if this suddenly materializing threat from 'shadowy extremist groups' is not the notorious musta'ribeen - Arabic-speaking Israeli informants who prey on Arab innate hospitality and friendliness. Which brings us to another issue of the 'non-existent' but somehow 'ever present' al-Qaeda™:

The Sting: Israel and Arab students as Al Qaeda Agents

Apparently Israel decided this month that there is one specific area of Palestinian or Arab oppression that wasn't appropriately explored yet. Why should the US get all the glory for capturing and torturing the evil al-Qaeda™ agents? After all, Shin Bet taught the brave US sons everything they know about the "right treatment" of the Muslim part of the world population. Besides, it never hurts to deepen the demonization of Muslims and tighten the grip on Israeli Arabs, who should never forget that they are at Israel's mercy.

And so, at first two Bedouin from Rahat were accused of having links to al-Qaeda and planning to carry out terrorist attacks in Israel, and only two weeks later six Arab students who study at Hebrew University were accused of collecting information in an attempt to shoot down a helicopter carrying senior officials during Bush's visit to Israel. Not surprisingly, they have admitted to the suspicions against them. After receiving Shin Bet's special treatment they would probably admit to anything, even taking responsibility for the recent jellyfish invasion on Tel Aviv beaches for example. Wouldn't you?

So let us repeat, for the sake of those readers who are still not tired of reading it over and over, that al-Qaeda™ doesn't exist. The only al-Qaeda ever found was the phony Mossad' constructed' 'al-Qaeda cell in Palestine'. Musta'ribeen, remember? By way of deception, thou shalt maintain the myth of the Palestinian suicide bomber and orchestrate terror attacks against the population you were sworn to protect.

© Unknown
Mossad agents arrested by the PA for attempting to set up phony 'al Qaeda' cells in the Gaza Strip.

But there is one specific aspect of this story that we wish to emphasize. Haaretz' version of the two Bedouin story mentions this:

"The Shin Bet investigation had focused on Taher, who had turned toward radical Islam in recent years. The Shin Bet concluded that he had contacted Al-Qaida through the Internet and agreed to participate in terrorist activities inside Israel, offering details on the location of Israel Defense Forces camps, strategic installations and crowded public places that could be targeted."

Looks like Taher was duped or manipulated using the oldest trick in the book, called otherwise: The Sting. Another case of two naive Arabs who were used to 'create the reality' of an enemy that simply does not exist. We may never know the true details of both stories, but you can read Joe Quinn's article on the FBI version of the procedure.

It is clear that Israel makes every effort it can to tighten the rope around the already barely breathing Palestinian population. But let's hope that all those attacks against the flesh won't break the spirit. Also remember that what comes around goes around, and all that implies.

Modus Operandi: Suspicious Suicides and Military Rearrangements

While Sarkozy's recent military reshuffles indicate a degree of haste, the same process has been taking place in the US over the last few years, with some recent events indicating that activity is also being sped up. Back in March, Admiral William J. Fallon "resigned" and was replaced soon afterwards with war pimp David Petraeus. Then, in June, Gen. Norton Schwartz was appointed as the new US Air Force chief, replacing Gen. Michael Moseley who was fired over the Minot AFB "missing nukes" incident back in August 2007. Moseley wasn't the only departure - USAF General and CIA director Michael Hayden was also discharged from the Air Force, as well as Air Force Secretary Michael Wynne. But all this "incompetence" centered around Minot doesn't end there. It was recently reported that a three-member ballistic missile crew fell asleep while in possession of classified launch codes for nuclear missiles.

Of course we are told not to worry, as the launch codes "were old and had been deactivated, and there was no actual security breach". Given the recent history of Minot, we respectfully ask that our skepticism regarding this claim be forgiven. How exactly do three servicemen on duty all fall asleep on the same shift? Negligence seems to be an explanation that is a little "too easy" to accept here. And if that weren't enough, there was a report less than a week ago of the likely suicide of Brig. Gen. Thomas Tinsley, who was previously working as executive officer to Gen. Moseley. According to the report, his wife and daughter were home at the time which, although not ruling out foul play, suggests that perhaps something drove the General to commit 'suicide' quite impulsively. The burden of some awful secret perhaps? Or something "external", as in it not being suicide at all? These 'useful suicides' appear to be piling up of late.

Locking down the psychopathic legal system and clinching Presidential Immunity

It's not only the military that is being "reshuffled" in the US. Congress has again kowtowed to its pathocratic overlords by passing an update to the FISA bill that legalizes US government domestic spying (including via secret programs), provides new powers and guarantees immunity to any telecommunications companies involved. This will also enable the neocon persecution of innocent American Muslims to continue legally, despite evidence that they have been spying illegally for years. As Glenn Greenwald wrote so eloquently for Salon:

"...our political establishment is doing what it now habitually does: namely, ensuring that the political and corporate elite who break our laws on purpose are immune from consequences."

And yet again we see glimpses of the true Barack Obama via his support for the bill's revision. Given such Orwellian measures though, Obama might be deluding himself if he thinks the general elections are even going to occur at all. With the previously outlined movements taking place in the Middle East, a war with Iran (perhaps instigated via a false flag attack) could break out before the US elections can take place.

From the psychopathic Executive Branch, and ponerized Legislative and Judicial branches, we can also see further "reshuffling" taking place in the form of Right-Wing Authoritarians filling the ranks of law enforcement. Consider the recent spate of terrible police Taser attacks; in the last month alone:

A 21-year old man died after being tased 9 times.
A 16-year old boy was hospitalized after being tased 19 times with a broken back.
A 66-year old reverend was tased over a joke.
A newly-married couple were tased and arrested at their wedding reception.
A blind, diabetic woman with cancer was tased to "facilitate handcuffing".
A 27-year old man was tased after seeking treatment at a hospital for a sinus infection.
And a 17-year old boy died after being tased for 37 seconds continuously.

© KY3 News

We can see from this small selection of articles that anyone can be a target for this kind of brutality - age, sex, race or health notwithstanding. And with a "terrorist" watch list now in excess of over a million names, blatant abuses of power by security personnel, rising incidences of paramilitary-style police home invasions, and outright confiscation of your personal property without any suspicion of wrongdoing, there can be little doubt that America is already a full-fledged police state, awaiting only the symbolic act that will make it a fascist dictatorship.

Suspicious Fires, Vancouver Explosion and Big Brother Reign

"Tell me your friends, and I'll tell you who you are." This bit of ancient wisdom sounds relevant as never before when one of your friends is labeled as: 'Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.' And with friends like this, there is no need for any more enemies.

After reading all the above sections, you should have a clear picture that another false flag operation is just a matter of time. And we are pretty much running out of that. But why concentrate on just one location if there are many other lucrative opportunities waiting to be utilized? One of those opportunities involves the US nearest neighbor - Canada. And Canada is going to host the 2010 Olympics. Apparently, and quite expected in our current atmosphere, the Olympics are planned as a major Big Brother event, with cameras and radars in the air, 13,000 security personnel and military back up - makes sense if upcoming Martial Law is all the rage.

But since the devil is in the details, we found this small notion on the Israel-Canada Chamber of Commerce site:

"The Canadians have begun preparations for the 2010 Winter Olympics.

The Trade Delegation has been in contact with the person responsible for security arrangements in the Organizing Committee of the 2010 Winter Olympics. With the help of the Export Institute a presentation will be prepared which will include details of Israeli companies capable of supplying products or services for Olympic Security."

Another project for Israeli companies that involves working on foreign security systems. Seems like this cat has no problem with getting his cream. Which is actually not surprising when in April Canada signed a special "Public Security" agreement with Israel.

Dear Canadians, feeling secure yet? Perhaps the following will ease your mind... or not.

On the 14th of July thousands of Vancouver residents experienced a power outage caused by an underground fire and explosion. Then 300 miles away in the British Columbia interior there was another similar explosion on 15th of July.

Amazing coincidence, don't you think? Even more interesting is to read people's comments on the event. This one for example found under the CBC version of the story:

"With the power out for more than 24 hours, most alarm systems' batteries would be run dry. That gives CSIS the perfect opportunity to set up their next terrorist attack against non-Conservative leaning Canadians."

Good to see that there are actually people who are paying attention. And in another comment we find two last paragraphs that talk about the Olympic related construction and 9/11.

Monday's fire in an underground power tunnel below downtown Vancouver caused an an early rush hour...

Beneath the camaraderie of shared experience, however, was the question: How could this happen in a city this size? How can this happen in a modern, first world country? But that was quickly followed by shared wonderment that it hadn't happened sooner with all of the major construction downtown.

Vancouver has nearly doubled in size in the past decade and now there's all this Olympic-related construction including the new rapid-transit line, convention centre, athletes' village, two new hotels downtown and dozens of condo projects.

And there's the lurking question from 9/11. If an accidental fire can wreak so much confusion, what would it be like if there were a planned and coordinated attack?"

Interesting, don't you think? For so many years Vancouver goes through a constant renovation and expansion, and never experienced any major outages due to 'accidental fires'. And only now, when many are busy with Olympic-related construction aided by Israeli security companies no less, there are two serious outages within two days. We hope you are thinking of what we are thinking here.

Yet another killer virus

Here's an alarming little item that caught our attention:

A newly discovered and highly lethal virus strain begins with symptoms similar to that of a cold but can quickly lead to severe respiratory crisis. [...]

The virus was discovered by infectious-disease expert David N. Gilbert, who noticed that otherwise healthy patients were being stricken by pneumonia so severe that they would die without oxygen treatment. The dangerous symptoms developed within only one or two days of initial cough and fever symptoms.

Since Gilbert's discovery of the virus in Portland, Oregon, outbreaks have been identified at military bases in Washington, Texas and South Carolina.

The disease is a variety of adenovirus, the family that includes 51 infectious agents responsible for diseases such as colds, pink eye, bronchitis and the stomach flu. A mutation has apparently occurred in a virus called adenovirus 14, making it much more lethal. In the first outbreak examined by Gilbert, seven of 30 hospitalized patients died.

"That's an incredibly high mortality rate," Gilbert said.

One would think that the appearance of a cold-like virus with an "incredibly high" mortality rate would make it to the mainstream media headlines, especially since the media has worked hard to scare us all with the bird flu in the past. But this wasn't the case; we searched for different versions of this article and came up almost empty handed, to the point that we initially wondered if this wasn't like one of those Pravda or Sorcha Faal fabricated disinformation 'news' items. A source was able to do a Nexis search and came up with this article from Internal Medicine News:

During the winter of 2006 and the spring of 2007, adenovirus 14 caused a community outbreak of respiratory disease in Oregon, with a fatality rate of 19%, Dr. Paul Lewis reported at the annual meeting of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

"This seemed to come out of nowhere," Dr. Lewis, a public health physician with the state of Oregon and a pediatric infectious disease physician with Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, said of the outbreak. "In patients with serious respiratory illness without an identified etiology, clinicians should think about viruses."

The cluster was first identified in the spring of 2007 by his associate, Dr. David Gilbert, who was making rounds in the intensive care unit at Providence Portland Medical Center and thought it was odd that 4 of 13 patients had adenovirus infections, which are typically mild and self-limited.

"When we called other hospitals in the Portland area, we almost fell out of our chairs because they all had seen recent severe and fatal cases of adenovirus," Dr. Lewis said.

The researchers studied 45 cases of adenovirus that were detected in Oregon medical laboratories between November 2006 and April 2007. The adenovirus isolates were typed by hexon gene sequencing or by a novel adenovirus 14-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction assay.

More than 75% of all adenovirus cases were in male patients. Of the 45 cases, 31 (69%) were adenovirus 14, a serotype first identified in 1953 but seen infrequently and never in outbreaks since that time.

However, the article quoted from Natural News above did not appear on a suspicious site, it made reference to real people, and it was supported by a report from November last year that stated that months before "a so-called boot camp flu sickened hundreds at Lackland Air Force Base in San Antonio. The most serious cases were blamed on the emerging virus and one 19-year-old trainee died." It added that it targeted "healthy young adults".


© Unknown
An enlarged view of an adenovirus

Apart from the obvious - that a killer virus emerging from military bases is highly suspicious - we should take note of its similarity to the Spanish flu of 1918-1919, which also preferred young and healthy victims. Curiously enough, in 2005 a group of scientists were able to recreate the virus.

So far, the only thing that appears to make the Spanish flu much more of a threat than the new virus is that the former was much more virulent. Viruses, though, tend to mutate, and we suggest to keep an eye on this one - just in case the connection with the military is not a mere coincidence, and therefore there is a likely intention of spreading it among the population, especially when taken together with the strange deaths of leading microbiologists. And you can add another to the list.

If such a criminal intention is real, then the criminals, acting from positions of power in the dark, are not dissimilar to the mafia, and like the mafia, it would make sense for them to send violent and intimidating messages to other players if needed. Could it be that the recent case of the two French biochemist students who were murdered in London was meant as a warning of sorts? It is unlikely that the work of any two students alone can make any difference on a global scale. But perhaps the work of the sponsoring institutions - the London Imperial College and the Polytech Clermont-Ferrard - could, or the work of the academic sphere as a whole.

The murder of the students was remarkable because of the apparent lack of motive, the unnecessary and extreme violence used, and the fact that each of them was researching a hot topic of our times: Laurent Bonomo was studying the proteins that cause infectious disease, while Gabriel Ferez hoped to become an expert in ecofriendly fuels.

Food for cars, not for people

Talking about ecofriendly fuels, we call your attention to the following bit of information:

Biofuels have forced global food prices up by 75% - far more than previously estimated - according to a confidential World Bank report obtained by the Guardian. The damning unpublished assessment is based on the most detailed analysis of the crisis so far, carried out by an internationally-respected economist at global financial body.

The figure emphatically contradicts the US government's claims that plant-derived fuels contribute less than 3% to food-price rises. It will add to pressure on governments in Washington and across Europe, which have turned to plant-derived fuels to reduce emissions of greenhouse gases and reduce their dependence on imported oil. [...]

haiti mud cakes
©David Levene

In Cité Soleil, one of Port-au-Prince's worst slums, making the clay-based food is a major income earner. Mud cakes are the only inflation-proof food available to Haiti's poor.

"Political leaders seem intent on suppressing and ignoring the strong evidence that biofuels are a major factor in recent food price rises," said Robert Bailey, policy adviser at Oxfam. "It is imperative that we have the full picture. While politicians concentrate on keeping industry lobbies happy, people in poor countries cannot afford enough to eat."

Rising food prices have pushed 100m people worldwide below the poverty line, estimates the World Bank, and have sparked riots from Bangladesh to Egypt. Government ministers here have described higher food and fuel prices as "the first real economic crisis of globalisation". [...]

So there it is. As we had already pointed out, the global food crisis has been manufactured by those who hold the strings of the world financial system, in pure Shock Doctrine style. Did you notice that our leaders want to hear nothing about the fact that biofuels are causing a food crisis? Why would they support something that harms people under the argument that it helps the environment (and therefore the people), while knowing that is not the case? Why are the leaders of the G8 countries showing such a lack of real concern for ending poverty?

Why, because it is not in their personal best interest, of course!

Place Your Bets and Look Up the Sky

Last month we shared with you our puzzlement with lack of adequate news coverage of possible sightings of our fiery messengers from space. But not all was lost and the Taurid shower did happen after all, even if with a bit of delay.

Only one day after the anniversary of Tunguska we've got a small demonstration of what those uninvited guests are capable of. As was reported in the previous article:

Dry weather, fires, spontaneous combustion? As it turns out the Taurid meteor event was not a complete bust, more like a combustion:

1st of July 2008 - Witnesses across Southern California say they saw an object 'moving very fast across the northern sky' and falling near the San Bernardino Mountains. Officials have no firm answers on what it was.

From Hollywood Hills to the Nevada state line, people reported seeing a fireball streaking across the sky and falling near the San Bernardino Mountains this morning. But explanations of the mysterious object were scarce.

San Bernardino County Fire Dispatch reported receiving dozens of calls related to what was described as fireball moving at high speed and falling in northwest sky around 10:40 a.m.

"We got quite a few reports. It started with a gentlemen in the Lake Arrowhead reporting a fireball in the Meadow Bay area and then we started getting calls from all over," said San Bernardino County dispatch supervisor Tom Barnes. "Fire crews in Barstow and on I-15 near Stateline came up on the radio and reported an object in the sky moving very fast across the northern sky and described it as yellowish green in color with streaks of debris. It looked like it burned up before it hit the ground."

Now isn't it a "coincidence" that California became engulfed, at its peak, in 1,783 fires across the state, scorching over 527,000 acres, including one in the San Bernardino mountains. Firefighters are still battling over 300 fires. Yet, all the fires are being blamed on "unusual early-summer lightning storms".

But California wasn't the only location engulfed with flames that day. There was another curiously similar event in Washington, also explained as triggered by lightning. But we can't really expect them to report anything with the word 'meteorite' attached to it, right? It makes things much more interesting, especially when one of those 'bright objects' may be mistaken for a nuclear missile.

Okanogan fire 3
©Chronicle photo by Al Camp
Fire lights up the night sky as it burns over a long line just outside Okanogan

Speaking of missiles: At the beginning of the month an 'unexpected meteor' (that's what happens when none of the astronomers are paying attention or doing their job) streaked across the Israeli sky and sparked fears that the country was under attack by Iran.

Israeli newspapers did their best to use the opportunity and add more confusion by making a connection between the sighting and Iranian missile testing. According to the speculations, Iran launched a missile without a warhead in order to test if it can reach Israel. Obviously military sources didn't bother to refute such handy propaganda delivered from the sky like a wrapped birthday gift.

The only thing we may add about it, is that we were offered yet another valuable demonstration of how such events may be used to further the murderous pathocratic agenda, especially when the next 'unexpected meteorite' actually falls on a populated area and causes damage similar to what happened in California.

And apparently the same object was also seen crossing the Cyprus sky. The witness accounts and 'questionable' nature triggered quite a discussion between our readers. At least no one implied that this was flare or a Chinese lantern. But that's when the work of identifying the nature of sightings becomes a little bit tricky for yours truly.

Since we are in the middle of a 'flap' (and we will go into that in much detail in the next section) many news reports of 'objects in sky' carry confusing details, leaving us wondering if those multiple simultaneous sightings of 'flares' are signs of a possible meteorite storm or another kind of uninvited and no less hostile guest?

With everything happening in the sky this month, we might as well pick a number and spin the roulette wheel.

And while you are busy gazing into the stars, let us share with you one last piece of information for this section which signifies that humanity is not the only one going through changes. Looks like our home planet is currently under maintenance. Watch out and don't stand under the scaffolding.

Rapid changes in the churning movement of Earth's liquid outer core are weakening the magnetic field in some regions of the planet's surface, a new study says.

"What is so surprising is that rapid, almost sudden, changes take place in the Earth's magnetic field," said study co-author Nils Olsen, a geophysicist at the Danish National Space Center in Copenhagen.

The findings suggest similarly quick changes are simultaneously occurring in the liquid metal, 1,900 miles (3,000 kilometers) below the surface, he said.

Attack of the Chinese Lanterns

In case you haven't noticed yet, there is a UFO flap. Most of it is taking place in the UK, but it is also happening in other places, such as Canada and the Middle East. Either that, or you believe that Chinese lanterns have suddenly become really popular all over the globe and are regularly released to float around every other night. Indeed, "paper lanterns" is the new official explanation for a number of sightings of orange objects in the skies. No doubt this will become a favorite of debunkers along with the more classic explanations of "planet Venus", "weather balloons" and "swamp gas", and you are certainly free to choose to believe that, if you must.

Image
©Matan

If, on the other hand, you share with us a conviction that there is more than enough evidence that many of the sightings do not have conventional explanations, then you may find it interesting to know that this summer British sightings have been at 'bizarre' levels; that Canada experienced a high increase of sightings in 2007; and that Apollo 14 astronaut Edgar Mitchell has publicly declared that UFOs are real, that insiders know the truth and alien bodies discovered are being studied.

There have been so many sightings of UFO and related phenomena lately that perhaps it's best to make a list of the ones we caught in the last five days or so, for a sample:

Canada: Sasquatch sighting has Grassy Narrows in a buzz (Big foot sightings are often related to UFOs.)
Argentina: Mutilations in Rosario del Tala (Cattle mutilations are also often related.)
Strange lights spotted in Israeli sky: Mossad's masters are calling?
UFO sightings in Stevenage, England
UK: Orange UFOs puzzle Birmingham
UK: Mysterious speeding object leaves UFO experts puzzled
UK: Mysterious lights over Sheffield
More Mystery lights spotted in UK skies
Weird lights in the sky set pulses racing across the UK
UK: Our Garden was Buzzed by a UFO!

While we cannot have any certainty about the real nature of the phenomena, we are pretty certain that this is not a reason to celebrate, as festive as Chinese lanterns may be. Quite the contrary; anyone who has studied the UFO phenomena impartially will conclude that for the most part, the intelligence behind it cares not about the well being of humanity.

A brief note on a scandal

Since we are on the subject of the bizarre, sinister and widely ignored 'elephants in the living room', we would like to make a brief news announcement which should be a scandal.

More than 2,000 US children reported missing per day

"According to the U.S. Department of Justice, 797,500 children were reported missing in a recent 12-month period. The department estimates about 2,100 children are reported missing each day."

This is more than enough reason to be shocked and horrified. And that's just within the U.S. How does a nation lose 800,000 children a year?? We would like to get more information on this issue, and if anyone out there has resources to look into this, we would be grateful.

Cui bono?

Those of you who read SOTT on a daily basis know that in order to get to the truth one has to go through layers and layers of lies and manipulation. But in many cases lies are so deep that at some point the process of peeling the onion involves wandering into a zone of many loose ends without any apparent connection between them. But since we know that this world is maintained by individuals who feed on power and total control, it becomes clear that there is a yet to be discovered layer of master puppeteers who prefer the role of back room operators and behind-the-scenes strategists. And as 'there is no honor among thieves', the front stage players along with the rest of the population are nothing but chess pieces, utilized for the sole purpose of furthering the desired agenda.

Image
©Unknown

But we didn't exactly shake your world by the above assessment, right? The Internet is full of sites talking about 'the shadow government', 'new world order', 'the Illuminati', etc. Each offers their unique point of view on how we are being duped. Well, we are not going to go that far, but we are going to indulge ourselves, just this time, and speculate on a somewhat high probability of another hidden layer of the current world events. Looks like those loose ends can be connected after all. Obviously, keeping in mind that whoever they are, they are pushing their plans according to a schedule.

There is a well known strategic technique: leading your ally to do the dirty work for you. But what happens when an ally is nothing but a useful, if indeed powerful, idiot? Let's see if we can spot someone like this by zeroing on our usual Axis of Evil players.

What better way to control the population than through the stomach. It is a given that everyone has to eat. Now that food production has been centralized, the breadbaskets of the world are either struggling to deal with unprecedented floods, dying in drought or succumbing to rust and terminator seeds which are here to stay, certain leaders won't think twice about killing off a few billion and bowing down before their masters, whoever they are. Looks like Svalbard opened just in time in case things get too carried away before the comet strikes...

Comet strikes? Sorry, we got carried away. Back to the issue at hand. So who's responsible for this turmoil other than the usual suspect, i.e. the banking system?

During the last interview with Andrzej M. Łobaczewski, he gave away a rather curious piece of information:

Q: And who in your opinion is on the top? What do you mean by the "order"?
A: The "Order"? Well, I cannot know who is there in the "order".
Q: Well, you think something about it, so what is your opinion?
A: I have a certain opinion. Well, this "order" is the center [of the pathocratic 'brotherhood'], which is located in England outside of London... The Trilateral Commission belongs to that center.

We have to admit that gathering objective facts on those guys was and is quite difficult. Nonetheless, we are left to wonder about what decisions are made somewhere in the corridors of the banks in London. And perhaps history can assist us in filling in some blanks as 'they' fill their bank accounts (and if they can't do that, they'll do it the 'old fashioned way')?

History takes us to the time of the Balfour Declaration, when many enlightened leaders thought that it would be a good idea to place Jews (read Zionists) in Palestine. But for what purpose? What is the interest of introducing a completely different culture into an Arab dominated region other than to make sure that the local power structures (numerous Arab countries) are prevented from becoming too powerful and holding an enormous amount of potential resources? It should be clear that a conflict was about to erupt. Or was it intentional?

These days we find ourselves in the situation where an increasing war-mongering climate is designed to give Israel the confidence to get out there and make a strike against Iran when, in fact, no one may actually intend to give them more than token backup with the hopes that all this war and fighting will basically reduce the populations - both Arab and Jewish - to almost nothing (if not nothing), so that the oil is then available to be grabbed by the "superpowers". If resources they want, resources they'll get - at any cost.

Is that too much of a stretch?

It is no secret that US is mainly dominated by pro-Zionist lobby, and in addition encouraged by the UK. This is something that may weaken the US and ultimately destroy it. There is no doubt that if the US chooses to engage Iran on Israel's behalf it will be so stretched that it will certainly collapse.

Cui bono?

It seems that the increasing price of oil is controlled and intended to be used as the reason for genocide. Notice how everyone of us is expected to make sacrifices, even if it means decreasing the content of our daily meals!

No doubt that those events are going to make an impact on other essential things like limiting our ability to travel. What if all airlines have to shut down or raise prices so that only the wealthy elite can travel because the price of oil is so high? Only the wealthy can eat. Only the wealthy can do anything at all because the price of oil - which underlies the price of everything else - keeps going up. But that won't stop them from flying their Lamborghinis 6,500 miles for an oil change.

We are not your garden variety conspiracy alarmists, mind you.

But we can't ignore the clear signs of an overt manipulation. Even the brightest of us are caught up in this spectacular five-ring display of diplomatic circus. So it seems that this is the time to utilize perspicacity and our own abilities to read the objective state of reality.

The bottom line is, what if they (those who walk London's or other corridors) are using the price of oil to control things? And what if the war-mongering is designed to lure Israel and possibly the US into another useless war so as to decimate both the Arab and Israeli populations, while the main plot is to grab as many resources as possible before it's too late? Too late in this case would be defined as before we have bigger problems to face, such as an impending cosmic catastrophe.

It's Magic Time!

We hope you didn't think that we would end this 'connecting the dots' installment on such a gloomy note. Because hope is exactly what helps us to maintain this small lighthouse of ours.

Despite all the darkness, there is much beauty and magic in things that are patiently waiting to be discovered. And we are happy to share with you one such thing - a picture of one of July's magnificent crop circles.

crop circle
©Temporary Temples

Thank you and good night.

zondag 10 augustus 2008

*» [Hostage to the Devil]

Recently I've been also reading the book 'Hostage to the Devil'. I haven't finished it yet, but I must say it's quite interesting! I will post (copy/paste) here some passages that I think might be interesting (or even important) info. I also might make a little clear summary myself of some quotes. I also have added some pics along the way to make reading more comfortable (I hope it does)
[emphasis mine]:

And without the grace that is born of true faith, Satan does what he does best-he ceases to exist in the eyes of those who do not see. [p.4]
Given the general conditions that surround us in our present society, it becomes all the more important to realize that even in the worst conditions, no person can be Possessed without some degree of cooperation on his or her part.

[...]

The effective cause of Possession is the voluntary collaboration of an individual, through his faculties of mind and will, with one or more of those bodiless, genderless creatures called demons.

[...]

Demonic Possession is not a static condition, an unchanging state. Nor does one become Possessed suddenly, the way one might break an arm or catch the measles. Rather, Possession is an ongoing process. A process that affects the two faculties of the soul: the mind, by which an individual receives and internalizes knowledge. And the will, by which an individual chooses to act upon that knowledge. [p.6-7]
Ample experience with the Possessed has clearly demonstrated that there are certain identifiable factors that dispose an individual to collaborate, in mind and will, with a Possessing demon. Disposing factors, therefore.
The presence of such disposing factors in a person's life does not in itself portend that the person will surely one day be numbered among the Possessed. At the same time, and with only rare exceptions in my experience, one or several of these disposing factors are operational in genuine cases of Possession. Some of the most common disposing factors have been with us for a long time, while others are of more recent vintage.
Some are in the nature of "instruments" outside the individual -the Ouija Board, for example, and the Spiritual Seance. Others are in the nature of "attitudes," whether taugh or self-learned, that are interiorized by the person - Transcendental Meditation and the Enneagram Method are two of the most prominent in this category. In the context of Possession, all disposing factors produce within a person a condition of those two faculties of soul - mind and will - that is most aptly described as an aspiring vacuum. Vacuum, because there is created an absence of clearly defined and humanly acceptable concepts for the mind. Aspiring, because there is a corresponding absence of clearly defined and humanly acceptable goals for the will.
In the case of the Ouija Board, or that of the Seance or TM or the Enneagram Method, the participants must dispose themselves precisely with a view to being opened up; to becoming desirous and accepting of whatever happens along.
The very term, Ouija, for example, is a display of this opening up for the term is composed of the French and German words - Oui and Ja - for Yes. The attitude of the participant in Ouija is literally "Yes, yes." The mind is to be made receptive to whatever suggestions or concepts are presented. If participants also dispose their wills to accept those concepts and act on them, then the predisposing circuit is complete.
The aspiring vacuum is operative and is powerful enough to flood the mind with appropriate concepts that can make a lid for the will's assent.
Often enough, the mind and the will are opened up in precisely this fashion in view of Possession.
Among the vast array of disposing factors likely to lead to Possession, the Enneagram Method is nowadays far and away the most common and pernicious. Given the general state of religion, it is not surprising that the Method's popularity is enormously enhanced by its having been enthusiastically adopted and propagated by Catholic theologians and teachers from the major religious Orders-Jesuit, Dominican, and Franciscan -and by some of the official organs used by the bishops of the United States and Canada charged with teaching religious doctrine to young and adult Catholics. [p. 6-7]


True to its name - enneagram means "nine points," or "marks"- the Enneagram is a nine-pointed mandala-type figure within a circle. The mandala character of the Enneagram is meant to represent the lotus and, as described by Swiss psychologist Carl Jung, is "a symbol depicting the endeavor to reunite the self."
The Enneagram came to the West from a now dead Asianic spiritual master, George Ivanovich Gurdjieff. Gurdjieff claimed in turn that it originated with the Sufi Masters of Islam. It reached the United States via "spiritual teachers" in Chile, Bolivia, and Peru and in the early 1970s was first broadcast here from the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California, and Loyola University in Chicago. There is now abundant literature on the subject.
According to Enneagram teaching, there are exactly nine types of human personality, each of which is represented by one of the nine points of the Enneagram figure. Each human being is inalterably confined to one, and only one, of those personality types. But within his or her type, each person is infinitely self-perfectible.
Two characteristics of the Enneagram Method comprise moral teachings that are irreconcilable with the basic moral teachings of Catholics in particular and Christians in general.
The basic presumption presented to the mind by the Enneagram Method is that each individual is self-perfectible, morally speaking, within that individual's personality type.
This presumption is in reality a late revival of an ancient heresy known as Pelagianism. It is at odds with the basic Christian teaching that we absolutely depend on the action of divine grace for all moral perfection. Of ourselves, we are helpless. Not only are we not infinitely self-perfectible; we will never of ourselves even escape the grip of our sinful nature. Only supernatural grace enables us to do that. And that grace is simply gratuitous on God's part.
The teaching of the Enneagram Method cuts both God and his grace out of the loop. In fact, there is no longer any loop at all. The individual is cut off from effective knowledge of his or her dependence on God and his supernatural grace for ultimate perfection. He or she is confined to an inalterable personality type, which has been laid out by Enneagram Masters.
The second faulty moral characteristic of the Enneagram Method completes the damage caused by the first. Having fatalistically accepted one's own category, the participant is dependent for perfection on the Enneagramatic exercises suitable for one's personality type. In other words, the soul of the Enneagram disciple is opened out and made docile, with the goal of receiving the promised self-knowledge congruent with his or her type. The soul becomes an apt and classic receptor-an aspiring vacuum -ready for the approach of an intending Possessor.

I have a comment to make here. I haven't yet read Gurdjieff's teachings about the Enneagram, anyhow I think that 'self-perfectible' is a word that can be interpreted in many ways. The way explained by the author here is just one way. And this way, or idea of being self-perfectible, might be a way that might get one open for a Possessor 'to get in'. Just like using an Ouija Board. And that's why knowledge and info is important before one even tries to use these kind of 'instruments'. And being 'helpless' or not depends on how someone thinks, knows, understands and interprets, I think. Carrying on:

In such a setting, the intending Possessor may come as what St. Paul described with dramatic precision as an Angel of Light. But the danger is all the more insidious for that. For in such a situation, the condition commonly called "perfect Possession" may be the result.
As the term implies, a victim of perfect Possession is absolutely controlled by evil and gives no outward indication, no hint whatsoever, of the demonic residing within. He or she will not cringe, as others who are Possessed will, at the sight of such religious symbols as a crucifix or a Rosary. The perfectly Possessed will not bridle at the touch of Holy Water, nor hesitate to discuss religious topics with equanimity.
If convicted of crimes against the law, such a victim will frequently acknowledge "guilt," and even the moral "badness" of the acts committed. More often than not, such a person will petition that his physical life be forfeited; that he be executed for his crimes. Thus, in his own way, he voices the insistent Satanist preference for death over life, and the fixated desire to join the Prince in his kingdom.
Because there is no will left to call the victim's own -and because some part of the victim's will is necessary for any hope of successful Exorcism - remedy is unlikely to succeed even in the event the Possession should somehow be uncovered and verified as the problem. [p.8-9]
In a very real sense, all of us - the Possessed, the professionals who must so frequently deal with them; the parents who fear for their children; everyone who lives in a society degraded by happenings that were only recently unimaginable to us -all are in the same boat.

[...]

Of the five Exorcees whose cases are recounted in Hostage to the Devil, none was perfectly Possessed. Hence, they were all apt subjects for the Rite of Exorcism. Their fortunes and lives have varied considerably since their individual Exorcisms. None fell back into Possession.
  • Marianne K. took training as a dental technician, married, and lived for nearly seventeen years. She died of cancer in the early 1980s.
  • Jonathan Yves is retired from the active priesthood. He entered the field of computers for a time, but has since abandoned that work and now lives with relatives. He never married.
  • Richard O. led a very active life as a counselor and therapist for a number of years in the United States before he migrated to Europe, where he died at the end of the last decade.
  • Jamsie Z. pursued his career in radio and is now semi-retired as the president of a company he founded.
  • Carl V. tested his religious vocation in more than one monastery before he decided to live almost as a hermit in a remote part of the United States.
More than the other four Excorcees described in Hostage to the Devil, Carl attained what more than one of his acquaintances readily call holiness. In the last two or three years of his life, he was graced with a special insight into the spiritual anguish of men and women who sought him out for counsel. Many of them speak of the radiance in his look and the power he had to bring peace to troubled minds.
Of the Exorcists who presented themselves as hostages to Satan for the liberation of his victims,
  • Father Peter,
  • Father David M.,
  • and Father Gerald are dead.
  • Father Mark A. is living in a home for retired priests.
  • Father Hartney F. may be the only one to reach the age of one hundred. Still living and retired to a nursing home, Father Hartney is afflicted with severe arthritis and is able to say Mass only with intense difficulty. [p.9-10]
All five of these Exorcists trained several other men and included in their instruction the wisdom and the selflessness needed for anyone who would voluntarily give himself as hostage in order to liberate another from the bondage of Possession.
The epitaph on the tombstone of the gentle Father Gerald is testimony to the vocation of all these men, and it is witness to the source of their strength. For that epitaph is from the mouth of the loving Lord in whose glory Gerald now rests: "Greater love than this no man hath, than that a man lay down his life for his friend."

Malachi Martin New York April 1992
How are you fallen from Heaven, Lucifer!
Son of the Dawn! Cut down to the ground!
And once you dominated the peoples!
Didn't you say to yourself: •
I will be as high as Heaven!
I will be more exalted than the stars of God!
I will, indeed, be the supreme leader!
In the privileged places!
I will be higher than the Skies!
I will be the same as the Most High God!
But you shall be brought down to Hell, to the bottom of its pit. And all who see you, will despise you. . . . -Isaiah 14:12-19
. . . "Lord! In your name, even evil spirits are under our control!"
And He said to them: "I saw Satan falling like lightning from Heaven.
You know: I gave you power . . . over all the strength of Satan. . . .
Nevertheless, don't take pride in the fact that spirits are subject to your control, but, rather, because you belong to God . . .
The Father has given Me all power. . . ." -Luke 10:17-22 [p.10]
Michael Strong - Part 1
Possession is not a process of magic. Spirit is real; in fact, spirit is the basis of all reality. "Reality" would not only be boring without spirit; it would have no meaning whatsoever. No horror film can begin to capture the horror of such a vision: a world without spirit.
Evil Spirit is personal, and it is intelligent. It is preternatural, in the sense that it is not of this material world, but it is in this material world. And Evil Spirit as well as good advances along the lines of our daily lives. In very normal ways spirit uses and influences our daily thoughts, actions, and customs and, indeed, all the strands that make up the fabric of life in whatever time or place. Contemporary life is no exception.
To compare spirit with the elements of our lives and material world, which it can and sometimes does manipulate for its own ends, is a fatal mistake, but one that is very often made. Eerie sounds can be produced by spirit-but spirit is not the eerie sound. Objects can be made to fly across a room, but telekinesis is no more spirit than the material object that was made to move. One man whose story is told in this book made the mistake of thinking otherwise, and he nearly paid with his life when he had to confront the error he had made. [p.13-14]
The exorcist is the centerpiece of every exorcism. On him depends everything. He has nothing personal to gain. But in each exorcism he risks literally everything that he values. Michael Strong's was an extreme example of the fate awaiting the exorcist. But every exorcist must engage in a one-to-one confrontation, personal and bitter, with pure evil. Once engaged, the exorcism cannot be called off. There will and must always be a victor and a vanquished. And no matter what the outcome, the contact is in part fatal for the exorcist. He must; consent to a dreadful and irreparable pillage of his deepest self.' Something dies in him. Some part of his humanness will wither from such close contact with the opposite of all humanness-the essence of evil; and it is rarely if ever revitalized. No return will be made to him for his loss. This is the minimum price an exorcist pays. If he loses in the fight with Evil Spirit, he has an added penalty. He may or may not ever again perform the rite of Exorcism, but he must finally confront and vanquish the evil spirit that repulsed him.
The investigation that may lead to Exorcism usually begins because a man or woman-occasionally a child-is brought to the notice of Church authorities by family or friends. Only rarely does a possessed person come forward spontaneously.
The stories that are told on these occasions are dramatic and painful: strange physical ailments in the possessed;
  • marked mental derangement;
  • obvious repugnance to all signs, symbols, mention, and sight of religious objects, places, people, ceremonies. Often, the family or friends report, the presence of the person in; question is marked by so-called psychical phenomena:
  • objects fly around the room;
  • wallpaper peels off the walls;
  • furniture cracks;
  • crockery breaks;
  • there are strange rumblings, hisses, and other noises', with no apparent source.
  • Often the temperature in the room where the possessed happens to be will drop dramatically.
  • Even more often an acrid and distinctive stench accompanies the person.
  • Violent physical transformations seem sometimes to make the lives of the possessed a kind of hell on earth.
  • Their normal processes of secretion and elimination are saturated with inexplicable wrackings ; and exaggeration.
  • Their consciousness seems completely colored by the violent sepia of revulsion.
  • Reflexes sometimes become sporadic or abnormal, sometimes disappear for a time.
  • Breathing can cease for extended periods. Heartbeats are hard to detect.
  • The face is strangely distorted, sometimes also abnormally tight and smooth without the slightest line or furrow.
When such a case is brought to their attention, the first and central problem that must always be addressed by the Church authorities is: Is the person really possessed?
Henri Gesland, a French priest and exorcist who works today in Paris, stated in 1974 that, out of 3,000 consultations since 1968, "there have been only four cases of what I believe to be demonic possession." T. K. Osterreich, on the other hand, states that "possession has been an extremely common phenomenon, cases of which abound in the history of religion." The truth is that official or scholarly census of possession cases has never been made. [p.15]

Certainly, many who claim to be possessed or whom others so describe are merely the victims of some mental or physical disease. In reading records from times when medical and psychological science did not exist or were quite undeveloped, it is clear that grave mistakes were made. A victim of disseminated sclerosis, for example, was taken to be possessed because of his spastic jerkings and slidings and the shocking agony in spinal column and joints. Until quite recently, the victim of Tourette's syndrome was the perfect target for the accusation of "Possessed": torrents of profanities and obscenities, grunts, barks, curses, yelps, snorts, sniffs, tics, foot stomping, facial contortions all appear suddenly and just as suddenly cease in the subject. Nowadays, Tourette's syndrome responds to drug treatment, and it seems to be a neurological disease involving a chemical abnormality in the brain. Many people suffering from illnesses and diseases well known to us today such as paranoia, Huntington's chorea, dyslexia, Parkinson's disease, or even mere skin diseases (psoriasis, herpes, for instance), were treated as people "possessed" or at least as "touched" by the Devil.
Nowadays, competent Church authorities always insist on thorough examinations of the person brought to them for Exorcism, an examination conducted by qualified medical doctors and psychiatrists.
When a case of possession is reported by a priest to the diocesan authorities, the exorcist of the diocese is brought in. If there is no diocesan exorcist, a man is appointed or brought from outside the diocese.
Sometimes the priest reporting the exorcism will have had some preliminary medical and psychiatric tests run beforehand in order to allay the cautious skepticism he is likely to meet at the chancery when he introduces his problem. When the official exorcist enters the case, he will usually have his own very thorough examinations run by experts he knows and whose judgment he is sure he can trust.
In earlier times, one priest was usually assigned the function of exorcist in each diocese of the Church. In modern times, this practice has fallen into abeyance in some dioceses, mainly because the incidence of reported possession has decreased over the last hundred years. But in most major dioceses, there is still one priest entrusted with this function-even though he may rarely or never use it. In some dioceses, there is a private arrangement between the bishop and one of his priests whom he knows and trusts.
There is no official public appointment of exorcists. In some dioceses, "the bishop knows little about it and wants to know less"-as in one of the cases recorded in this book. But however he comes to his position, the exorcist must have official Church sanction, for he is acting in an official capacity, and any power he has over Evil Spirit can only come from those officials who belong to the substance of Jesus' Church, whether they be in the Roman Catholic, the Eastern Orthodox, or the Protestant Communions. Sometimes a diocesan priest will take on an exorcism himself without asking his bishop, but all such cases known to me have failed.
It is recognized both in the pre-exorcism examinations and during the actual exorcism that there is usually no one physical or psychical aberration or abnormality in the possessed person that we cannot explain by a known or possible physical cause. And, apart from normal medical and psychological tests, there are other possible sources for diagnosis. However rickety and tentative the findings of parapsychology, for example, one can possibly seek in its theories of telepathy and telekinesis an explanation of some of the signs of possession. Suggestion and suggestibility, as modern psychotherapists speak of them, can account for many more.
Still, with the diagnoses and opinions of doctors and psychologists in hand, it is often discovered there are wide margins of fluctuation. Competent psychiatrists will differ violently among themselves; and in psychology and medicine, ignorance of causes is often obscured by technical names and jargon that are nothing more than descriptive terms.
Nevertheless, the combined medical and psychological reports are carefully evaluated and usually weigh heavily in the final judgment to proceed or not with an exorcism. If according to those reports there is a definite disease or illness which adequately accounts for the behavior and symptoms of the subject, Exorcism is usually ruled out, or at least delayed to allow a course of medical or psychiatric treatment.
But finally, reports in hand, all evidence in, Church authorities judge the situation from another, special point of view, formed by their own professional outlook. [p.15-16]

They believe that there is an invisible power, a spirit of evil; that this spirit can for obscure reasons take possession of a human being; that the evil spirit can and must be expelled-exorcised-from the person possessed; and that this exorcism can be done only in the name and by the authority and power of Jesus of Nazareth. The testing from the Church's viewpoint is as rigorous in its search as any medical or psychological examination.
In the records of Christian Exorcism from as far back as the lifetime of Jesus himself, a peculiar revulsion to symbols and truths of religion is always and without exception a mark of the possessed person. In the verification of a case of possession by Church authorities, this "symptom" of revulsion is triangulated with other physical phenomena frequently associated with possession-
  • the inexplicable stench;
  • freezing temperature;
  • telepathic powers about purely religious and moral matters;
  • a peculiarly unlined or completely smooth or stretched skin, or unusual distortion of the face, or other physical and behavioral transformations;
  • "possessed gravity" (the possessed person becomes physically immovable, or those around the possessed are weighted down with a suffocating pressure);
  • levitation (the possessed rises and floats off the ground, chair, or bed; there is no physically traceable support);
  • violent smashing of furniture,
  • constant opening and slamming of doors,
  • tearing of fabric in the vicinity of the possessed, without a hand laid on them; and so on.
When this triangulation is made of the varied symptoms that may occur in any given case, and medical and psychiatric diagnoses are inadequate to cover the full situation, the decision will usually be to proceed and try Exorcism. [p.16]

There has never been, to my knowledge, an official listing of exorcists together with their biographies and characteristics, so we cannot satisfy our modern craving for a profile of, say, "the typical exorcist." We can, however, give a fairly clear definition of the type of man who is entrusted with the exorcism of a possessed person.
  • Usually he is engaged in the active ministry of parishes.
  • Rarely is he a scholarly type engaged in teaching or research.
  • Rarely is he a recently ordained priest.
  • If there is any median age for exorcists, it is probably between the ages of fifty and sixty-five.
  • Sound and robust physical health is not a characteristic of exorcists, nor is proven intellectual brilliance, postgraduate degrees, even in psychology or philosophy, or a very sophisticated personal culture.
  • In this writer's experience, the 15 exorcists he has known have been singularly lacking in anything like a vivid imagination or a rich humanistic training.
All have been sensitive men of solid rather than dazzling minds. Though, of course, there are many exceptions, the usual reasons for a priest's being chosen are his qualities of moral judgment, personal behavior, and religious beliefs-qualities that are not sophisticated or laboriously acquired, but that somehow seem always to have been an easy and natural part of such a man. Speaking religiously, these are qualities associated with special grace.
There is no official training for an exorcist. Before a priest undertakes Exorcism, it has been found advisable-but not always possible or practical-for him to assist at exorcisms conducted by an older and already experienced priest.
Once possession has been verified to the satisfaction of the exorcist, he makes the rest of the decisions and takes care of all the necessary preparations. In some dioceses, it is he who chooses the assistant priest. The choice of the lay assistants and of the time and place of the exorcism is left to him.
The place of the exorcism is usually the home of the possessed person, for generally it is only relatives or closest friends who will give care and love in the dreadful circumstances associated with possession. The actual room chosen is most often one that has had some special significance for the possessed person, not infrequently his or her own bedroom or den. In this connection, one aspect of possession and of spirit makes itself apparent: the close connection between spirit and physical location. The puzzle of spirit and place makes itself felt in many ways and runs throughout virtually every exorcism. There is a theological explanation for it. But that there is some connection between spirit and place must be dealt with as a fact.
I wonder why this would be [place - spirit].
Once chosen, the ,room where the exorcism will be done is cleared as far as possible of anything that can be moved. During the exorcism, one form of violence may and most often does cause any object, light or heavy, to move about, rock back and forth, skitter or fly across the room, make much noise, strike the priest or the possessed or the assistants. It is not rare for people to emerge from an exorcism with serious physical wounds. Carpets, rugs, pictures, curtains, tables, chairs, boxes, trunks, bedclothes, bureaus, chandeliers, all are removed.
Doors very often will bang open and shut uncontrollably; but because exorcisms can go on for days, doors cannot be nailed or locked with unusual security. On the other hand, the doorway must be covered; otherwise, as experience shows, the physical force let loose within the exorcism room will affect the immediate vicinity outside the door.
Windows are closed securely; sometimes they may be boarded over in order to keep flying objects from crashing through them and to prevent more extreme accidents (possessed people sometimes attempt defenestration; physical forces sometimes propel the assistants or the exorcist toward the windows).
A bed or couch is usually left in the room (or placed there if necessary), and that is where the possessed person is placed. A small table is needed. On it are placed a crucifix, with one candle on either side of it, holy water, and a prayer book.
Sometimes there will also be a relic of a saint or a picture that is considered to be especially holy or significant for the possessed. In recent years in the United States, and increasingly abroad as well, a tape recorder is used. It is placed on the floor or in a drawer or sometimes, if it is not too cumbersome, around the neck of an assistant.
The junior priest colleague of the exorcist is usually appointed by diocesan authorities. He is there for his own training as an exorcist. He will monitor the words and actions of the exorcist, warn him if he is making a mistake, help him if he weakens physically, and replace him if he dies, collapses, flees, is physically or emotionally battered beyond endurance-and all have happened during exorcisms. The other assistants are laymen. Very often a medical doctor will be among them because of the danger to all present of strain, shock, or injury. The number of lay assistants will depend on the exorcist's expectation of violence. Four is the usual number. Of course, in remote country areas or in very isolated Christian missions, and sometimes in big urban centers, there is no question of assistants. There simply is none available, or there is no time to acquire any. The exorcist must go it alone. [p.18]

An exorcist comes to know from experience what he can expect by way of violent behavior; and, for their own sakes, possessed people must usually be physically restrained during parts of the exorcism. The assistants therefore must be physically strong. In addition, there may be a straitjacket on hand, though leather straps or rope are more commonly used.
It is up to the exorcist to make sure that his assistants are not consciously guilty of personal sins at the time of the exorcism, because they, too, can expect to be attacked by the evil spirit, even though not so directly or constantly as the exorcist himself. Any sin will be used as a weapon.
The exorcist must be as certain as possible beforehand that his assistants will not be weakened or overcome by obscene behavior or by language foul beyond their imagining; they cannot blanch at blood, excrement, urine; they must be able to take awful personal insults and be prepared to have their darkest secrets screeched in public in front of their companions. These are routine happenings during exorcisms. Assistants are given three cardinal rules: they are to obey the exorcist's commands immediately and without question, no matter how absurd or unsympathetic those commands may appear to them to be; they are not to take any initiative except on command; and they are never to speak to the possessed person, even by way of exclamation.
Even with all the care in the world, there is no way an exorcist can completely prepare his assistants for what lies in store for them. Even though they are not subject to the direct and unremitting attack the priest will undergo, it is not uncommon for assistants to quit-or be carried out-in the middle of an exorcism. A practiced exorcist will even go so far as to make a few trial runs of an exorcism beforehand, on the old theory that forewarned is forearmed-at least to some degree.
Timing in an exorcism is generally dictated by circumstances. There is usually a feeling of urgency to begin as soon as possible. Everyone involved should have an open schedule. Rarely is an exorcism shorter than some hours-more often than not ten or twelve hours. Sometimes it stretches for two or three days. On occasion it lasts even for weeks. Once begun, except on the rarest occasions, there are no time outs, although one or other of the people present may leave the room for a few moments, to take some food, to rest very briefly, or go to the bathroom. (One strange exorcism where there was a time out is described in this book. The priest involved would have preferred one hundred times going straight through the exorcism rather than suffer the mad violence that caused the delay.)
The only people in an exorcism who dress in a special way are the exorcist and his priest assistant. Each wears a long black cassock that covers him from neck to feet. Over it there is a waist-length white surplice. A narrow purple stole is worn around the neck and hangs loosely the length of the torso.
Normally, the priest assistant and the lay assistants prepare the exorcism room according to the exorcist's instructions. They and the exorcee are ready in the room when the exorcist enters, last and alone.
There is no lexicon of Exorcism; and there is no guidebook or set of rules, no Baedeker of Evil Spirit to follow. The Church provides an official text for Exorcism, but this is merely a framework. It can be read out loud in 20 minutes. It merely provides a precise formula of words together with certain prayers and ritual actions, so that the exorcist has a preset structure in which to address the evil spirit. In fact, the conduct of an exorcism is left very much up to the exorcist. [p.18-19]

So far, quite interesting huh?! Well this part that comes up is even more interesting, check it out [I will post this in a different color, because I think it might be important for research later or for looking up etc] [p.19-23]:

Nevertheless, any practiced exorcist I have spoken with agrees that there is a general progress through recognizable stages in an exorcism, however long it may last. One of the most experienced exorcists I have known and who was in fact the mentor of the exorcist in the first case related in this book, gave names to the various general stages of an exorcism. These names reflect the general meaning or effect or intent of what is happening, but not the specific means used by the evil spirit or by the exorcist. Conor, as I call him, spoke of Presence, Pretense, Breakpoint, Voice, Clash, and Expulsion. The events and stages these names signify occur in nine out of every ten exorcisms.

Presence:

From the moment the exorcist enters the room, a peculiar feeling seems to hang in the very air. From that moment in any genuine exorcism and onward through its duration, everyone in the room is aware of some alien Presence. This indubitable sign of possession is as unexplainable and unmistakable as it is inescapable. All the signs of possession, however blatant or grotesque, however subtle or debatable, seem both to pale before and to be marshaled in the face of this Presence.

There is no sure physical trace of the Presence, but everyone feels it. You have to experience it to know it; you cannot locate it spatially- beside or above or within the possessed, or over in the corner or under the bed or hovering in midair.

In one sense, the Presence is nowhere, and this magnifies the terror, because there is a presence, an other present. Not a "he" or a "she" or an "it." Sometimes, you think that what is present is singular, sometimes plural. When it speaks, as the exorcism goes on, it will sometimes refer to itself as "I" and sometimes as "we," will use "my" and "our."

Pretense:

Invisible and intangible, the Presence claws at the humanness of those gathered in the room. You can exercise logic and expel any mental image of it. You can say to yourself: "I am only imagining this. Careful! Don't panic!" And there may be a momentary relief. But then, after a time lag of bare seconds, the Presence returns as an inaudible hiss in the brain, as a wordless threat to the self you are. Its name and essence seem to be compounded of threat, to be only and intensely baleful, concentratedly intent on hate for hate's sake and on destruction for destruction's sake. In the early stages of an exorcism, the evil spirit will make every attempt to "hide behind" the possessed, so to speak-to appear to be one and the same person and personality with its victim. This is the Pretense.

The first task of the priest is to break that Pretense, to force the spirit to reveal itself openly as separate from the possessed-and to name itself, for all possessing spirits are called by a name that generally (though not always) has to do with the way that spirit works on its victim.

As the exorcist sets about his task, the evil spirit may remain silent altogether; or it may speak with the voice of the possessed, and use past experiences and recollections of the possessed. This is often done skillfully, using details no one but the possessed could know. It can be very disarming, even pitiful. It can make everyone, including the priest, feel that it is the priest who is the villain, subjecting an innocent person to terrible rigors. Even the mannerisms and characteristics of the possessed are used by the spirit as its own camouflage.

Sometimes the exorcist cannot shatter the Pretense for days. But until he does, he cannot bring matters to a head. If he fails to shatter it at all, he has lost. Perhaps another exorcist replacing him will succeed. But he himself has been beaten.

Every exorcist learns during Pretense that he is dealing with some force or power that is at times intensely cunning, sometimes supremely intelligent, and at other times capable of crass stupidity (which makes one wonder further about the problem of singular or plural); and it is both highly dangerous and terribly vulnerable.

Oddly, while this spirit or power or force knows some of the most secret and intimate details of the lives of everyone in the room, at the same time it also displays gaps in knowledge of things that may be happening at any given moment of the present. But the priest must not be lulled by small victories or take chances on hoped-for stupidities. He must be ready to have his own sins and blunders and weaknesses put into his mind or shouted in ugliness for all to hear. He must not make excuses for his past, or wither as even his loveliest memories are fingered by ultimate filth and contempt; he must not be sidetracked in any way from his primary intention of freeing the possessed person before him. And he must at all costs avoid trading abuse or getting into any logical arguments with the possessed. The temptation to do so is more frequent than one might think, and must be regarded as a potentially fatal trap that can shatter not only the exorcism, but quite literally shatter the exorcist as well.

Breakpoint:

Accordingly, as the Pretense begins to break down, the behavior of the possessed usually increases in violence and repulsiveness. It is as though an invisible manhole opens, and out of it pours the unmention-ably inhuman and the humanly unacceptable. There is a stream of filth and unrestrained abuse, accompanied often by physical violence, writhing, gnashing of teeth, jumping around, sometimes physical attacks on the exorcist.

A new hallmark of the proceedings enters as the Breakpoint nears, and ushers in one of the more subtle sufferings the exorcist must undergo: confusion. Complete and dreadful confusion. Rare is the exorcist who does not falter here for at least a moment, enmeshed in the peculiar pain of apparent contradiction of all sense.

His ears seem to smell foul words. His eyes seem to hear offensive sounds and obscene screams. His nose seems to taste a high-decibel cacophony. Each sense seems to be recording what another sense should be recording. Each nerve and sinew of onlookers and participants becomes rigid as they strive for control. Panic-the fear of being dissolved into insanity-runs in quick jabs through everyone there. All present experience this increasingly violent and confusing assault. But the exorcist is the one who rides the storm. He is the direct target of it all.

The Breakpoint is reached at that moment when the Pretense has finally collapsed altogether. The voice of the possessed is no longer used by the spirit, though the new, strange voice may or may not issue from the mouth of the victim. In Thomas Wu's case, the alien voice did come from the possessed's mouth; and that was why the police captain was so startled. The sound produced is often not even remotely like any human sound.

At the Breakpoint, for the first time, the spirit speaks of the possessed in the third person, as a separate being. For the first time, the possessing spirit acts personally and speaks of "I" or "we," usually interchangeably, and of "my" and "our" or "mine" and "ours."

Voice:

Another very frequent sign that the Breakpoint has been reached is the appearance of what Father Conor called the Voice.

The Voice is an inordinately disturbing and humanly distressing babel. The first few syllables seem to be those of some word pronounced slowly and thickly-somewhat like a tape recording played at a subnormal speed. You are just straining to pick up the word and a layer of cold fear has already gripped you-you know this sound is alien. But your concentration is shattered and frustrated by an immediate gamut of echoes, of tiny, prickly voices echoing each syllable, screaming it, whispering it, laughing it, sneering it, groaning it, following it. They all hit your ear, while the alien voice is going on unhurriedly to the next syllable, which you then try to catch, while guessing at the first one you lost. By then, the tiny, jabbing voices have caught up with that second syllable; and the voice has proceeded to the third syllable; and so on.

If the exorcism is to proceed, the Voice must be silenced. It takes an enormous effort of will on the part of the exorcist, in direct confrontation with the alien will of evil, to silence the Voice. The priest must get himself under control and challenge the spirit first to silence and then to identify itself intelligibly.

As in all things to do with Exorcism of Evil Spirit, the priest makes this challenge with his own will, but always in the name and by the authority of Jesus and his Church. To do so in his own name or by some fancied authority of his own would be to invite personal disaster. Merely human power unadorned and without aid cannot cope with the preternatural. (It is to be remembered that when we speak of the preternatural, we are not speaking about what are known as poltergeists.)

Clash:

Usually, at this point and as the Voice dies out, a tremendous pressure of an obscure kind affects the exorcist. This is the first and outermost edge of a direct and personal collision with the "will of the Kingdom," the Clash.

We all know from our personal experience that there can be no struggle of single personal wills without that felt and intuitive contact between two persons. There is a two-way communication that is as real as a conversation using words. The Clash is the heart of a special and dreadful communication, the nucleus of this singular battle of wills between exorcist and Evil Spirit.

Painful as it will be for him, the priest must look for the Clash. He must provoke it. If he cannot lock wills with the evil thing and force that thing to lock its will in opposition to his own, then again the exorcist is defeated.

The issue between the two, the exorcist and the possessing spirit, is simple. Will the totally antihuman invade and take over? Will it, noisome and merciless, seep over that narrow rim where the exorcist would hold his ground alone, and engulf him? Or will it, unwillingly, protestingly, under a duress greater than its single-track will, stop, identify itself, cede, retire, disappear, and be volatilized back into an unknown pit of being where no man wants to go ever?

Expulsion:


Even with all the pressure on him, and in fullest human agony, if the exorcist has got this far, he must press home. He has gained an advantage. He has already forced the evil spirit to come out on its own. If he has not been able to until now, he must finally force it to give its name. And then, some exorcists feel, the exorcist must pursue for as much information as he can. For in some peculiar way, as exorcists find, the more an evil spirit can be forced to reveal in the Clash and its aftermath, the surer and easier will be the Expulsion when that moment comes. To force as complete an identification as possible is perhaps a mark of domination of one will over another.

It is of crucial interest to speculate about the violence provoked by Exorcism-the physical and mental struggles that are so extreme they can bring on death. Why would spirit battle so? Why not leave and waft off invisibly to someone or someplace else?

For spirit itself seems to suffer in these battles.

Time and again, in exorcism after exorcism, there occurs that curious thing to do with spirit and place, the strange puzzle mentioned previously in connection with the room chosen for the exorcism. When Jesus expelled the unclean spirits, those spirits showed concern for where they might go. In record after record, as well as in several exorcisms recounted in this book, the possessing spirits wail in lament and questioning pain: "Where shall we go?" "We too have to possess our habitation." "Even the Anointed One gave us a place with the swine." "Here . . . we can't stay here any longer."

Evil Spirit, having found a home with a consenting host, does not appear to give up its place easily. It claws and fights and deceives and even risks killing its host before it will be expelled. How violent the struggle probably depends on many things; the intelligence of the spirit being dealt with and the degree of possession achieved over the victim are perhaps two one could speculate about.

Whatever determines the actual pitch of violence, once the exorcist has forced the invading spirit to identify itself, and sustained the first wordless bout of the Clash, and then invoked its formal condemnation and expulsion by the Exorcism rite, the immediate result is generally a struggle tortuous beyond/imagining, an open violence that leaves all subtlety behind.

The person possessed is by now obviously aware in one way or another of what possessed him. Frequently he becomes a true battleground for much of the remainder of the exorcism, enduring unbelievable punishment and strain.

It is sometimes possible for the exorcist to appeal directly to the possessed person, urging him to use some part of his own will still free of the spirit's influence and control, and engage directly in the fight, aiding the exorcist. And at such moments no animal pinned helplessly to the ground struggles more pathetically against the drinking of its life's blood by a voracious and superior cruelty. The very nauseous character of the possessed person's appearance and behavior appears to be a sign of his desire for deliverance, a desperate sign of struggle, evidence of a revolt where once he had consented.

Increasingly what had possessed him is being forced into the open, all the while protesting its victim's revolt and its own expulsion. The violence of the contortions and the physical disfigurement of the possessed can reach a degree one would think he could not possibly withstand.

The exorcist, too, comes in for full attack now. Once cornered, the evil spirit seems able to call on a superior intelligence, and will try to lure the exorcist on to a field boobytrapped and mined with situations from which no human can extricate himself.

Any weakness in the religious faith that alone sustains the exorcist or any fatigue will allow the exorcist's mind to be flooded with a terrible light he cannot fend off-a light that can burn the very roots of his reason and turn him emotionally into the most servile of slaves desperate to be liberated from all bodily life.

These are only some of the dangers and traps that face every exorcist. His pain is physical, emotional, mental. He has to deal with what is eerie but not enthralling; with something askew, but intelligently so; with a quality that is upside down and inside out, but significantly so. The mordant traits of nightmare are there in full regalia, but this is no dream and permits him no thankful remission.

He is attacked by a stench so powerful that many exorcists start vomiting uncontrollably. He is made to bear physical pain, and he feels anguish over his very soul. He is made to know he is touching the completely unclean, the totally unhuman. All sense may suddenly seem nonsense. Hopelessness is confirmed as the only hope. Death and cruelty and contempt are normal. Anything comely or beautiful is an illusion. Nothing, it seems, was ever right in the world of man. He is in an atmosphere more bizarre than Bedlam.

If, in spite of his emotions and his imagination and his body-all trapped at once in pain and anguish-if, in spite of all this, the will of the exorcist holds in the Clash, what he does is to approach his final function in this situation as an authorized human witness for Jesus. By no power of his, on account of no privilege of his own, he calls finally on the evil spirit to desist, to be dispossessed, to depart and to leave the possessed person.

And, if the exorcism is successful, this is what happens. The possession ends. All present become aware of a change around them. The sense of Presence is totally, suddenly absent. Sometimes there are receding voices or other noises, sometimes only dead silence.
  • Sometimes the recently possessed may be at the end of his strength;
  • sometimes he will wake up as from a dream, a nightmare, or a coma.
  • Sometimes the former victim will remember much of what he has been through;
  • sometimes he will remember nothing at all.
Not so for the exorcists, during and after their grisly work. They carry nagging doubts and bitter conflicts untellable to family, friend, superior, or therapist. Their personal traumas lie beyond the reach of soothing words and deeper than the sweep of any consoling thoughts.

They share their punishment with none but God. Even that has its peculiar sting of difficulty. For it is a sharing by faith and not by face-to-face communication. But only thus do these men, seemingly ordinary and commonplace in their lives, persevere through the days of quiet horror and the nights of sleepless watching they spend for years after as their price of success, and as abiding reminders that, once upon a time, another human being was made whole, because they willingly incurred the direct displeasure of living hatred.

Here he writes a little more about the upcoming 5 cases he's gonna write about:
The following five case histories are true. The lives of the people involved are told on the basis of extensive interviews with all of the principals involved, with many of their friends and relatives, and with many others involved directly or indirectly in minor ways. All interviews have been independently checked for factual accuracy wherever possible. The exorcisms themselves are reproduced from the actual tapes made at the time and from the transcripts of those tapes. The exorcisms have necessarily been cut for reasons of length; all of the exorcisms recorded here lasted more than 12 hours.

I have chosen these five cases from among a greater number known and available to me because, both singly and taken together, they are dramatic illustrations of the way in which personal and intelligent evil moves cunningly along the lines of contemporary fads and interests, and within the usual bounds of experience of ordinary men and women. No fourteenth- or fifteenth- or sixteenth-century case, for all its possible romantic appeal, would have any relevancy for us today. On the contrary, it would remain a simple matter for us to dismiss such cases as fables made up to suit the fears or fancies of "more ignorant" people of "less sophisticated" times. Each case presented here includes as an important element some basic attitude or attitudes popular in our own society. In the possessed person, it is pushed to a narrow and frightening extreme.

In the first case, Zio's Friend and the Smiler, the insistence is that there is no essential difference between good and evil, and ultimately no difference between being and nonbeing; that all values are subject only to one's personal preferences.

In Father Bones and Mister Natch, the compelling idea that was seized by Evil Spirit seemed to be that all mysteries can and are resolved in "natural" (i.e., rational or scientific or quantifiable) explanations; that there can be no relevance for the modern person in anything that cannot be rationally understood; and that there can be no truth important to man beyond what is rational.

In The Virgin and the Girl-Fixer, the battle concerned some of the great, deep, and mysterious "givens" of our very nature and our society-in this case, gender and human love. The priest in this case said to me a few months before he died, in one of the most profound conversations of my life: "A bird doesn't fly because it has wings. It has wings because it flies." We will ignore that mysterious truth in its applications to our sexuality and our gender only at our great peril, I believe.

In Uncle Ponto and the Mushroom-Souper, we have an example of what may be happening to many in our modern society-without their realizing it and without those around them taking cognizance of it. For it seems that there is an individualism, a purely personalistic interpretation of human life abroad today, which exceeds by far the bounds of what used to be known as selfishness and egotism. It has produced in thousands of people an aberrant and idiosyncratic behavior which is truly destructive.

In The Rooster and the Tortoise, the fatal confusion (and in this case it was literally almost fatal) was between spirit and psyche; between those parts and attributes of ours that are quantifiable, and yet through which spirit most easily makes itself known. If everything we have taken to be of spirit can be made to seem a product merely of the human psyche, with no meaning or significance beyond its factualness, then love can be made to seem only a chemical interraction, and love's paradigm is killed.
[p.23-24]


In each case, one basic note of possession is confusion.
  • Sex is confused with gender.
  • Spirit is confused With psyche.
  • Moral value is confused with absence of any value.
  • Mystery is confused with untruth.
  • And, in every case, rational argument is used, not to clarify, but as a trap, to foster confusion and to nurture it as a major weapon against the exorcist.
Confusion, it would seem, is a prime weapon of evil.

There is much more to be observed and said about the meaning of possession. Not everything can be covered in a single volume. But possession and Exorcism are not themselves mere fads with no interest beyond the bizarre and significantly frightening. They are tangible expressions of the reality which envelops the daily lives of ordinary people. No study of possession and Exorcism cases within the Christian optic would be adequate without a minimum of explanation -from the Christian point of view-about that reality: what takes place in possession, and how that degrading process develops in a particular individual. Such an explanation occupies the final section of this book.

This study makes no attempt to answer the ultimate puzzle of possession: why this person rather than that person becomes the object of diabolic attack which can end in partial or perfect possession. The answer certainly does not lie in psychological probings, in heredity, or in social phenomena. A final answer will include, as prime ingredients, the personal free choice which each individual makes and the mystery of human predestination. About free choice we know the essentials: I can choose evil for no other reason or motive than that I choose evil. Some apparently do. About predestination we know little or nothing. The puzzle remains.

All of the men and women involved in the five cases reported here are known to me personally; they have given their fullest cooperation on the condition that their identities and those of their families and friends not be revealed. Therefore, all names and places have been changed, and other possible pointers to identity have been obscured. Any similarity between the cases reported here and any others that may have occurred is unintentional and purely coincidental.

You'll have to read the stories yourself in the book if you want to know them! I'm gonna copy some pieces from the 5 stories here that I think might be important or significant etc. I am however gonna post the 1st story, to see if it might be better or not to copy the whole story or just some pieces of it. Just experimenting here.
The Cases

1. Zio's Friend and the Smiler
[In the first case, Zio's Friend and the Smiler, the insistence is that there is no essential difference between good and evil, and ultimately no difference between being and nonbeing; that all values are subject only to one's personal preferences.]

Victim: [
Marianne K. took training as a dental technician, married, and lived for nearly seventeen years. She died of cancer in the early 1980s.]

Peter took one more breath of fresh air. He was reluctant to pull the open window shut against the uproar on 125th Street 15 stories below. It was the first time in history that a Roman Pope was driving through New York streets, and the very air was alive with excitement. The Pope's motorcade had already passed over Willis Avenue Bridge into the Bronx on its way to Yankee Stadium. The crowds were still milling around. Some nuns scurried about like frenzied penguins blowing whistles and marshaling lines of white-clad schoolgirls. Hot-dog vendors shouted their prices. A dowdiry dressed young woman and her child peddled plastic little popes to passersby. Two policemen were removing wooden barriers. A garbage truck snorted and honked its way through the traffic. Father Peter closed the window finally, drew the curtains together, and turned back toward the bed.

The room was quiet again, except for the irregular breathing of twenty-six-year-old Marianne. She lays on a gray blanket thrown over the bare mattress. With her faded jeans, yellow body-shirt, auburn hair straggling over her forehead, the pallor of her cheeks, and the aging, off-white color of the walls around her, she seemed part of a tragically washed-out pastel. Except for a funny twist to her mouth, her face had no expression.

To Peter's left, with their backs to the door, stood two bulky men. One: an ex-policeman and a friend of the family, a veteran of 32 years on the force, where, he thought, he had seen everything. He was about to find out that he hadn't. Sixtyish, balding, clad in dungarees, his arms folded over his chest, his face was a picture of puzzlement. The other the closest acquaintance of Marianne's father, whom the children called uncle, was a bank manager and a grandfather in his midfiftie red-faced and jowled, in a blue suit, his arms hanging by his sides, fixed on Marianne's face with an expression of helpless fear. Both the men, athletic and muscular, had been asked to assist at the exorcism of Marianne K., to quell any physical violence or harm she might attempt. Marianne's father, a wispy man with reddened eyes and drawn face, stood with the family doctor. He was praying silently. Peter always insisted on having a member of the family present- at exorcism. As if in contrast to the others, the young doctor, a| psychiatrist, wore a concentrated, almost studious look as he checked the girl's pulse.

Peter's colleague, Father James, a priest in his thirties, stood at the foot of the bed. Black-haired, full-faced, youthful, apprehensive, his black, white, and purple robes were a uniform for him. On Peter, with his tousled gray hair and hollow-cheeked look, the same colors melted into a veiled unity. James was dressed up ready to go. Peter, the; campaigner, had been there.


On a night table beside James two candles flickered. A crucifix rested between them. In one corner of the room there was a chest of ; drawers. "Should have had it removed before we started," Peter thought. The chest, originally left there in order to hold a tape recorder, had become quite a nuisance. Probably would continue to be until the whole business was finished, Peter thought. But he knew better than to fiddle with any object in the room, once the exorcism had begun.

It was a Monday, 8:15 P.M., the seventeenth hour into Peter's third exorcism in thirty years. It was also his last exorcism, although he could not know that. Peter felt sure that he had arrived at the Breakpoint in the rite. In the few seconds it took him to cross from the window to her bed, Marianne's face had been contorting into a mass of crisscrossing lines. Her mouth twisted further and further in an S-shape. The neck was taut, showing every vein and artery; and her Adam's apple looked like a knot in a rope.

The ex-policeman and her uncle moved to hold her. But her voice threw them back momentarily like a whiplash:
"You dried-up fuckers! You've messed with each other's wives. And with your own peenies into the bargain. Keep your horny paws off me!

"Hold her down!" Peter spoke peremptorily. Four pairs of hands clamped on her. "Jesus have mercy on my baby," muttered her father. The ex-policeman's eyes bulged. "YOU!" Marianne screamed, as she lay pinned flat on the bed, her eyes open and blazing with anger, "YOU! Peter the Eater. Eat my flesh, said she. Suck my blood, said she. And you did! Peter the Eater! You'll come with us, you freak. You'll lick my arse and like it, Peeeeeeeetrrrrrr," and her voice sank through the "rrrr" to an animal gurgle.

Something started to ache in Peter's brain. He missed a breath, panicked because he could not draw it, stopped and waited, swaying on his feet. Then he exhaled gratefully. To the younger priest he looked frail and vulnerable. Father James handed Peter his prayer book, and they both turned to face Marianne.

Almost a year later, in 1966, on the day Peter was buried in Calvary Cemetery, his younger colleague, Father James, chatted with me after the funeral service. "It doesn't matter what the doctor said" (the official report gave coronary thrombosis as cause of death), "he was gone, really gone, after that last to-do. Just a matter of time. Mind you, it wasn't that he wasn't brave and devoted. He was a real man of God before and after the whole thing. But it took that last exorcism to make him realize that life knocks the stuffing out of any decent man." Peter had apparently never emerged from a gentle reverie after the exorcism of Marianne; and he always spoke as if he were talking for the benefit of someone else present. It was as exasperating as listening to one side of a telephone conversation.

"He was never the same again," said James. "Some part of him passed into the Great Beyond during the final Clash, as you call it." Then, after a pause and musingly, almost to himself: "Can you beat that? He had to be born in Lisdoonvarna" sixty-two years ago, be reared beside Killarney, and come all the way over here three times-just to find out the third time where he was supposed to die; and how, and when. Makes you think what life's all about. You never know how it's going to end. Peter did not become an American citizen, even. All that travel. Just to die as the Lord had decided."

Peter was one of seven children, all boys. His father moved from County Clare to Listowel, County Kerry, where he prospered as a wine merchant. The family lived in a large two-story house overlooking the river Feale. They were financially comfortable and respected. Their Roman Catholicism was that brand of muscular Christianity which the Irish out of all Western nations had originated as their contribution to religion.

Peter spent his youth in the comparative peace of "the old Rritish days" before the Irish Republican Brotherhood (parent of the IRA), the Irish Volunteers, and the 1916 Rebellion started modern Ireland off on the stormy course of fighting for the "terrible beauty" that lured Patrick Pearse, James Connolly, Eamonn De Valera, and the other leaders into the deathtrap of bloodletting, where, 50 years later, in Peter's declining years, blood was still being shed.

School filled three-quarters of the year for Peter. Summers were spent at Real Strand, at Ballybunion seaside, or harvesting on his grandfather's farm at Newtownsands. One such summer, his sixteenth, Peter had his only brush with sex. He had lain for hours among the sand dunes of Beal Strand with Mae, a girl from Listowel whom he had known for about three years. That day, their families had gone to the Listowel races.

Innocent flirting developed into simple love play and finally into a fervid exchange of kisses and caresses, until they both lay naked and awesomely happy beneath the early-evening stars, the warmth undulating and glowing sweetly through their bodies as they huddled close together. Afterward, Mae playfully nicknamed him "Peter the Eater," To calm his fear she added: "Don't worry. No one will know how you made love to me. Only me."

For about a year afterward, he was interested in girls and particularly in Mae. Then early in his eighteenth year, he began to think of the priesthood. By the time he finished schooling, his mind was made up. Peter had told me once: "When we said goodbye, that summer of 1922, Mae teased me: 'If you ever leave the seminary and) don't marry me, I'll tell everyone your nickname.' She never told a; human soul.

But, of course, they knew." Peter's sole but real enemies were the shadowy dwellers of "the Kingdom" whom he vaguely called "they." He gave me a characteristic look and stared away over my head. Mae had died in 1929 of a ruptured appendix.

Peter started his studies at Killarney Seminary and finished them at Numgret with the Jesuits. He was no brilliant scholar, but got very good grades in Canon Law and Hebrew, which he pronounced with an Irish brogue ("My grandfather was from one of the Lost Tribes"), acquired a reputation for good, sound judgment in moral dilemmas, and was renowned locally because with one deft kick of a football he could knock the pipe out of a smoker's mouth at 30 yards and not even graze the man's face.

Ordained priest at twenty-five, he worked for six years in Kerry. Then he did a first stint in a New York parish for three years. He was present twice at exorcisms as an assistant. On a third occasion, when he was present merely as an extra help, he had to take over from the exorcist, an older man, who collapsed and died of a heart attack during the rite.

Two weeks before he sailed home to Ireland for his first holiday in three years, the authorities assigned him his first exorcism. "You're young, Father. I wish you'd had more experience," was the way he recalled the bishop's instructions, "but the Old Fella won't have much on you or over you. So go to it."

It had lasted 13 hours ("In Hoboken, of all places," he used to say whimsically), and had left him dazed and ill at ease. He never forgot the statement of murderous intent hurled at him by the man he had exorcised. Through foaming spittle and clenched teeth and the smell of a body unwashed for two years prior, the man had snarled:

"You destroy the Kingdom in me, you shit-faced alien Irish pig. And you think you're escaping. Don't worry. You'll be back for more. And more. Your kind always come back for more. And we will scorch the soul in you. Scorch it. You'll smell. Just like us! Third strike and you're out! Pig! Remember us!"

Peter remembered. But a two-week vacation in County Clare restored him to his energy and verve. "God! The scones running with salty butter, and the hot tea, and the Limerick bacon, and the soft rain, and the peace of it all! 'Twas great."

Most of Peter's wounds were not inflicted by the harsh realities of the world around him; but, deep within him, they opened as his way of responding to the evil he sometimes sensed in daily life.

Those who still remembered him in 1972 agreed that Peter had been neither genius nor saint. Black-haired, blue-eyed, raw-boned in appearance, he was a man of little imagination, deep loyalties, loud laughter, gargantuan appetite for bacon and potatoes, an iron constitution, an inability to hate or bear a grudge, and in a state of constant difference of opinion with his bishop (a tiny old man familiarly called "Packy" by his priests). Peter was somewhat lazy, harmlessly vain about his 6' 2" height, and a lifelong addict of Edgar Wallace detective stories. "He had this distinct quality," remarked one of his friends. "You felt he had a huge spirit laced with cast-iron common sense and untouched by any pettiness."

In normal circumstances, Peter would have stayed on permanently in Ireland after his vacation of scones and soft rain. He would have worked in parishes for some years, then acquired a parish of his own. But there was something else tugging at his heart and something else written in his stars. When he left for New York at the outbreak of the Korean War in order to replace a chaplain who had been called up, he recalled the exorcism in Hoboken. "Third strike and you're out! Pig! Remember!"

He remarked jokingly to a worried friend who knew the whole story: " 'Tis not the third time yet!"

In January 1952, he was asked to do his second exorcism. His effectiveness in the first exorcism and the resilient way he had taken it recommended him to the authorities.

The exorcism took place in; Jersey City. And, in spite of its length (the better part of three days and three nights), it took very little out of him physically or mentally.

Spiritually, it had some peculiar significance for him.

"It was a sort of warmer-upper for the 1965 outing," he told me in 1966. "The ceremony lasted too long for my liking, was hammer and tongs all the way, almost beat us. But there was no great strain inside here [pointing to his chest]." And he added with a significance that eluded me then: "Jesus had a forerunner in the Baptist. I suppose; darkness has its own."

Looking back on his role as exorcist today, it is clear to me that first two exorcisms prepared him for the third and last one. They were three rounds with the same enemy. The exorcee that January was a sixteen-year-old boy of Hispanic origin who had been treated for epilepsy over a period of years, only to lie finally declared nonepileptic and physically sound as a bell by a team of doctors from Columbia Presbyterian Hospital. Nevertheless, on the boy's return home, all the dreadful disturbances started all over again in a much more emphasized way, so the parents, turned to their priest.

"If he met the Devil at the top of the stairs one morning and saw; Jesus Christ standing at the bottom," added another, "he wouldn't turn his back on the one in his hurry to get down to the other. He'd back down. Just to be sure."

"They tell me you've a ... eh ... a sort of a way with the Devil, Father," said the wheezy, red-faced monsignor, grinning awkwardly as he gave the necessary permissions and instructions to Peter. Then, stirring in his chair, he added grimly as a bad Catholic joke: "But don't bring him back here to the Chancery with you. Get rid of him or it or her or whatever the devil it is. We have enough of all that on our backs here already."

It had gone well. The boy became Peter's devoted friend. Later he went to Vietnam and died in an ambush late one night outside Saigon. His commanding officer wrote, enclosing an envelope with Peter's name on it which the dead man had left behind. It contained a piece of bloodstained linen and a short note. Over a decade previously, just before his release from possession, in a final paroxysm of revolt and appeal, he had clawed at Peter's wrist, and Peter's blood had fallen on his shirt sleeve. "I kept this as a sign of my salvation, Father," the note said. "Pray for me. I will remember you, when I am with Jesus."

Peter was then forty-eight years old and in his prime as a priest. Yet in himself, he suffered from a growing sense of inadequacy and worthlessness. He felt that, in comparison with many of his colleagues who had attained degrees, qualifications, high offices, and acknowledged expertise, he had very little to show by way of achievement. "I have no riches inside me," he wrote to a brother of his, "just black poverty. Sometimes it darkens my soul." When his turn for a parish of his own came around, he was passed over. (Packy was dead already; but, some said, the dead bishop had made sure in his records that Peter would be passed over.)

Peter, in fact, was a maverick. The normal priest found him inferior in social graces but superior in judgment, lacking in ecclesiastical know-how and ambition but very content with his work. Sometimes his protestations of being "poor inside," of having "no excellent talents" sounded hollow when matched with his stubborn and opinionated attitudes. Anyway, the normal bishop would take one look into his direct gaze and decide that his own authority was somehow at stake. For Peter's stare was not insolent, but yet unwavering; it acknowledged the demands of worth but was devoid of any subservience. It said: "I respect you for what you represent. What you are is something else." Such a man was unsettling for the absolutist mind and threatening for the authoritarian bent of most ecclesiastics.

Beyond the occasional funny remark, such as "The higher they go, the blacker their bottoms look," Peter gave no outward impression of discontent or anxiety. A lack of self-confidence saved him from revolt or disgust. And he bore it all lightly. "Well, Father Peter," one bishop joshed him as he left to do a three-month stint in London parish work, "off you go to hell or to glory, eh?" Peter laughed it off: "In either case, bishops get the priority, my lord."

Had he raised protests and used the influential friends at his disposal, he would doubtless have retired in good time to the rural repose of a peaceful Kerry parish and the extraordinary autonomy of a parish priest. (A pope or a bishop approached any settled "P.P." with care. Only his housekeeper could make a frontal assault on a parish priest's autonomy. But, then again, Irish housekeepers were a race unto themselves.)

As Peter was and as he chose to remain-in strict dependence on ecclesiastical whims and never striking out to seek a fixed position-he was available to be tapped for a temporary visit to Rome and an accidental meeting that changed him profoundly.

After his second exorcism, there were ten more years of "helping out" in various dioceses, practically always on a temporary basis as substitute for other priests. And then a chance breakfast in late September 1962 brought him together with a West Coast bishop who, on his way to the opening of the Second Vatican Council in Rome, stayed a few days in New York. The bishop was well known for his sympathy with mavericks and his welcome for "hard cases." Like all the bishops who went to the council, he needed one or two experts in theology to be his advisors in Rome. He needed, in particular, a theologian counselor skilled in pastoral matters.

The next day Peter was aboard a TWA flight with the bishop enroute to the Eternal City. But for that trip, he probably would not have been at the side of Marianne three years later. And he certainly would never have come close to two men who had a sudden, deep influence on the rest of his life. In Rome, Peter performed his duties as a counselor during his ten-week stay there. But what mattered much more to him personally and affected him deeply were his experiences with Father Conor and with Paul VI, then Monsignor Montini.

Father Conor was a diminutive Irish Franciscan friar, bald-headed, sharp-eyed, and voluble, who taught theology at a Roman university. He wore rimless glasses, trotted and never walked, and spoke with a very strong brogue which made his Latin lectures all but unintelligible.

He held court for students, professors, foreign visitors, officials, and friends in his monastery room after siesta hour, three or four days a week. There, any bit of gossip in Rome could be learned, tested, and assessed for its rumor value. For half of Rome always feeds on rumors about the other half. And speculation is the stick which continually stirs the pool of rumor. "They till me, me frind, that . . ." was a frequent opening of Conor's conversation.

Conor spent his summers fishing around Lough Corrib, Ireland, was an expert on Waterford glass, and had a lifelong fascination for all politics, civil and ecclesiastical, a fascination that made Vatican Council II appeal to Conor as catnip to a cat. He had studied demonology ("Mostly ballyhoo," he pronounced in his thick brogue), witchcraft ("A lotta junk, if y'ask me"), Exorcism ("A mad bizniz"), and possession ("The divil's toe-rag"). He served as a consultant to one Roman office that dealt with cases of possession; and on 14 occasions he had conducted exorcisms (but always protested that he "wouldn't touch wan wid a barge pole, unliss they ordher'd me teh"). According to an in joke about Conor that always made him furious, he induced devils to leave the possessed by threatening to "send them back to Ireland."

Outside Roman clerical circles, Conor's activity as an exorcist-was relatively unknown. Indeed, he was regarded by his fellow clergy in Ireland as a bookworm and by his lay friends as a "grand, simple, innocent man, slightly dotty about the Middle Ages."

Peter and Conor were approximately the same age. They shared a love of Ireland and a passion for Rome's ruins. And Conor sensed in Peter a mind never tarnished by the baser ambitions he saw eating into those who gyrated and jockeyed around him in Rome on the political treadmill. He also felt Peter's sense of his own worthlessness. He found Peter's exorcism experiences enormously interesting. For Peter had "the touch," he used to say-a natural ability to weather exorcism's storms. On the other hand, Peter found in Conor a friend of practical experience and advice. Rambling in the Roman suburbs, sitting in the cortile of Conor's monastery, visiting the sights of Rome, sipping coffee in the Piazza Navona, they gradually assumed the roles of master and disciple. Peter put questions; Conor answered them. He explained. He theorized. He instructed. He warned. He corrected. He encouraged.

In the area of Exorcism, Conor had things reduced to a recognizable pattern of behavior: how the possessed behaved; how the possessing spirit acted; and how the exorcist should react and conduct the exorcism. During the long walks and talks with Conor, Peter crystallized his own first impressions and learned some valuable guidelines.

He had never realized the radical distinction between the perfectly possessed and the revolters. Nor had he understood the revolters as victims of possession who, partly with their own connivance, surely, had become hostage and were now trying, on the one hand, to give some sign, to summon help, but who in that struggle also became victims of a violent protest against such help-a protest made by the evil thing that possessed them.

Peter was able to adjust and correct his techniques immediately, even without conducting further exorcisms, once Conor explained that the major portion of every exorcism was taken up with shattering a pretense, dispelling a smokescreen; that the most dangerous period lay in the Breakpoint of that Pretense and in the clash of wills that followed at once between the exorcist and the thing that tortured the possessed; and that the "Grate Panjandhr'm" (Conor's epithet for the Devil) intervened only rarely.

In Conor's view, the world of evil spirits was like an autocratic organization: "Joe Shtaleen used to sind Molotov to do his dirty work. So the Grate Panjandhr'm sens his hinchmin."

Conor taught Peter tricks and ruses; and he gave him tags-phrases, words, numbers, concepts-to label perilous phases, capital moments and events in an exorcism. He made available to Peter some of his own practices: the use of "teaser texts," for instance. At certain awkward gaps in the exorcism, there was no way to contend head to head with the possessed and with what was possessing them. The possessing spirit literally hid behind the identity of the possessed. It had to be flushed out into the open. Conor had the habit of reading certain texts chosen from the Gospels, until such time as the spirit made mistakes or arrogantly threw aside its disguise.

Conor's advice was always concrete and vivid, and always in Peter's mind echoed with that warm, fresh brogue they both shared like a piece of common turf: "The t'ing is beyond yer mind. It's a sperrit agin vnors. The reel camuflin' starrts inside in yeh. And yeh'r just an ole toe-rag, unless Jesus is wid yeh."

But, above all else, Conor reconciled Peter to the inevitable drain mi the exorcist. He explained in simple terms what wounds he could receive as an exorcist, what wounds he should avoid, and what wounds were incurable once inflicted on him. All these wounds were "internal" to spirit and mind and memory and will. Peter had received some minor ones already. He now realized what he could undergo.

Conor refined Peter's primitive idea of "the Devil" and of "Devils," expressing in simple terms what to most moderns is an enigma if not downright nonsense: how that which has no body can be a person, have a personality. And he dealt curtly with psychoanalysts: "Down the road a bit, they're goin' to find out that the whole thing is entoirely differr'nt; and then they'll put Siggy and company up on the shelves as histhorical lave-overrs, like Galen on bones or Arishtot'l on plants."

But it was not Conor who rid Peter of his lack of confidence. He could never give Peter a reason to trust his own judgment. It was the man who in two years would become Paul VI who made that change in him.

Peter never exchanged one sentence with Giovanni Battista Mon-tini, then Archbishop of Milan. Montini had been relegated from the Vatican to the political wilderness of Milan by Pope Pius XII, had survived it, and now was back in Rome-"still listening to his voices" (as the Roman wags described the ethereal gaze of Montini and the impression he gave of having shutters over his eyes to hide the light within)-and was deeply involved in the council.

tbc